Teams

LVTA BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-11vs WYO SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Debbie Hansen vs Nancy Pajak / Megan Hayes6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Tracy Dooley6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Linley / Sue Schneider vs Ginger Paige / Patricia Hansen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-04vs HMTC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen vs Rosalie Krammer / Cimarron Spitz6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Karen Pielin vs Nancy Williams / Teresa Adsit7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarcia Linley / Sue Schneider vs Rona van Sickle / Karen Johnson2-6, 0-6
2025-05-28vs MLF PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Dawn Hagen vs Leticia Dunn / Marie Massey6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarcia Linley / Ashley Kasprzak vs Mary Wedum / Jean Tonoli6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Pielin / Sue Schneider vs Betsy Markey / Ruth Dukart3-6, 2-6
2025-05-21vs TAG YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Dawn Hagen vs Michelle Sheets / Amber Slade6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Ashley Kasprzak vs Janet Crespin / Marcia Stauter6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Pielin / Marcia Linley vs Gina Solanyk / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik6-3, 6-3
2025-05-18vs FCCC TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Robyn Brady / Tahni Clay6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Judy O'Gorman vs Karen Weller / Jenny McCulloch6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSue Schneider / Karen Pielin vs Kelly Day / Lisa Clay1-6, 5-7
2025-05-14vs LT WHITELost 12
W#1 DoublesDawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes vs Carri Miller / Anja Mau6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Judy O'Gorman vs Janice Mossberg / Jill Brooks6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Ashley Kasprzak vs Vicky Hadley / Laura Powers3-6, 4-6
2025-04-30vs CSU GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesLesa Morrill-Hughes / Dawn Hagen vs Kim Jensen / Denise Andrews6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Judy O'Gorman vs Debora J Miller / Sara Mullarkey6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Ashley Kasprzak vs Adrienne LeBailly / Susan Davidson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT WHITE6116512135
2LVTA BLUE5213820178
3HMTC ORANGE3491226190
4WYO SILVER3481331233
5TAG YELLOW1681328205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Debbie Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Dawn Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Ashley Kasprzak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Judy O'Gorman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Marcia Linley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.69
Sue Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Lumpkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesa Morrill-Hughes + Dawn Hagen9455% games+3.9% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Marcia Linley2547% games+0.0% vs expected
Judy O'Gorman + Nancy Pflughoeft3746% games−3.7% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Ashley Kasprzak4350% gamesnot enough data
Judy O'Gorman + Marcia Linley044 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pflughoeft + Ashley Kasprzak044 matchesnot enough data
Judy O'Gorman + Karen Pielin123 matchesnot enough data
Judy O'Gorman + Dawn Hagen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Hansen
24W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Dawn Hagen
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Kasprzak
38W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Judy O'Gorman
58W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Lesa Morrill-Hughes
83W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Marcia Linley
27W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.94
Sue Schneider
3W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Karen Lumpkin
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.