Teams

TAG YELLOW

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-11vs MLF PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Marie Massey / Mary Wedum6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik vs Carol Murphy / Maka Hammock1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Gina Solanyk vs Leticia Dunn / Tracy Hutton1-6, 3-6
2025-06-04vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Crespin / Larea Warden vs Denise Andrews / Janet Gugliotto7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Gina Solanyk vs Sara Mullarkey / Debora J Miller3-6, 1-6
2025-05-28vs LT WHITELost 12
L#1 DoublesLarea Warden / Janet Crespin vs Carri Miller / Jill Brooks6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Slade / Becky Buhler vs Janice Mossberg / Karen Trevino6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Debbie Rowe vs Vicky Hadley / Lori Loeb1-6, 2-6
2025-05-21vs LVTA BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Amber Slade vs Debbie Hansen / Dawn Hagen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Crespin / Marcia Stauter vs Lesa Morrill-Hughes / Ashley Kasprzak0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Solanyk / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik vs Karen Pielin / Marcia Linley3-6, 3-6
2025-05-14vs FCCC TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecky Buhler / Michelle Sheets vs Karen Weller / Lisa Olsen1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoyce Hirano-Kuznik / Janet Crespin vs Kristie Steinbock / Robyn Brady3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Solanyk / Marcia Stauter vs Jane Gronewoller / Jenny McCulloch3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-07vs HMTC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Crespin / Amber Slade vs Teresa Adsit / Tammy Bell0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Sheets / Laura Dunn vs Karen Johnson / Nancy Williams6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcia Stauter / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik vs Cathy Simon / Rona van Sickle6-3, 6-3
2025-04-30vs WYO SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Crespin / Becky Buhler vs Alyson Hagy / Adelle Byra6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Dunn / Amber Slade vs Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Tracy Dooley3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Rowe / Gina Solanyk vs Vicky Kmetz / Nancy Pajak2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT WHITE6116512135
2LVTA BLUE5213820178
3HMTC ORANGE3491226190
4WYO SILVER3481331233
5TAG YELLOW1681328205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Janet Crespin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Becky Buhler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Amber Slade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Larea Warden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Michelle Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Debbie Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Marcia Stauter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.65
Gina Solanyk
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Laura Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Sheets + Janet Crespin7556% games+8.5% vs expected
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Janet Crespin6654% games+2.0% vs expected
Michelle Sheets + Amber Slade9549% games+0.1% vs expected
Larea Warden + Janet Crespin833656% games−1.5% vs expected
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Michelle Sheets0838% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik + Larea Warden0636% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Sheets + Marcia Stauter3348% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Sheets + Larea Warden3266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Crespin
130W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Becky Buhler
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Amber Slade
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Larea Warden
109W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Michelle Sheets
66W–96L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Joyce Hirano-Kuznik
63W–79L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Debbie Rowe
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Marcia Stauter
93W–81L career · 9 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Gina Solanyk
13W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Laura Dunn
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.