Teams

CK RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs LEBTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesSandra Tate / Rebecca Shefte vs Sally Pearson / Hanne Schauer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesValere Mathis vs Christie Bianco7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKerry Barker / Kerri Luther vs Lee Unger / Leslie DeVilliers6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Gilliland / Kelly Weber vs Teri Sexauer / Leigh Dunn6-1, 6-3
2021-07-16vs BM TEALSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Seifert / Kerri Luther vs Jenny Kelly / Deanna Deorio6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKerry Barker vs Lori Davis7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gilliland / Sandra Tate vs Sandy McGregor / Aree Bly7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Dawe / Lisa Banks vs Casey Hemphill / Gretchen Morrison4-6, 4-6
2021-07-12vs KC NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKerry Barker / Jennifer Seifert vs Phyllis Glawe / Margaret Lamb - (DQ)*1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSandra Tate vs Lauri Lehan6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKerri Luther / Jennifer Gilliland vs Jeanine Smith / Jodi Thomas2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Banks / Amanda Halsey vs Maret Lindgren / Janet Weyhmiller6-3, 7-5
2021-06-28vs SSLGT BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKerri Luther / Amanda Halsey vs Kimberly Graves / Sabine Hatch3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Sowitch vs Susan Johnson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKerry Barker / Jennifer Seifert vs Becky Hodous / Elizabeth Potarf6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Banks / Valere Mathis vs Shawn Blackwood / Linda Smith6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs KC BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesSandra Tate / Amanda Halsey vs Anne Means / Susan Conroy2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesValere Mathis vs Nicole Manutes5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKerri Luther / Kerry Barker vs Debbie Lathrop / Diane Willoughby7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Dawe / Jennifer Gilliland vs Erin Barnett / Michelle Ziemian1-6, 4-6
2021-06-07vs HW REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSandra Tate / Andrea Sowitch vs Kathy Norford / Vicki Sutherland6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesValere Mathis vs Kathleen Goldy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Seifert / Kelly Weber vs Carol Decker / Amy Kinney3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKerry Barker / Kerri Luther vs Polly Cantor / Kami Guarino6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Andrea Sowitch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.78
Kerri Luther
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amanda Halsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kelly Weber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Sandra Tate
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.63
Kerry Barker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Jennifer Gilliland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Jennifer Seifert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Dawe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Banks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Shefte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Valere Mathis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Luther + Rebecca Shefte4261% games+14.9% vs expected
Andrea Sowitch + Sandra Tate4155% games+7.4% vs expected
Kerri Luther + Sandra Tate8260% games+6.7% vs expected
Jennifer Gilliland + Sandra Tate5448% games+4.8% vs expected
Rebecca Shefte + Amanda Halsey5355% games+4.5% vs expected
Rebecca Shefte + Sandra Tate4354% games+0.4% vs expected
Kerri Luther + Kerry Barker14753% games+0.1% vs expected
Andrea Sowitch + Jennifer Gilliland5947% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Sowitch
64W–55L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Kerri Luther
65W–63L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Amanda Halsey
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Danielle Matsuyama
18W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Weber
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Sandra Tate
39W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Kerry Barker
73W–66L career · 6 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
Jennifer Gilliland
50W–90L career · 4 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Jennifer Seifert
9W–21L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Dawe
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Banks
33W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Shefte
34W–23L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Valere Mathis
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.