Teams

KC BLACK

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.95 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs KC NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTerri Jennings / Jody Dart vs Jodi Thomas / Meghan Geisler3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Conroy / Anne Means vs Maret Lindgren / Debra West4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Burns / Michelle Ziemian vs Janet Weyhmiller / Lauri Lehan6-2, 6-1
2021-07-14vs SSLGT BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesJody Dart / Terri Jennings vs Becky Hodous / Elizabeth Potarf6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Susan Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebbie Lathrop / Stacy Gregg vs Kimberly Graves / Lana Banbury7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnita Burns / Erin Barnett vs Linda Smith / Shawn Blackwood6-1, 6-2
2021-07-12vs BM TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnne Means / Susan Conroy vs Sandy McGregor / Aree Bly2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Jenny Kelly2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Gregg / Debbie Lathrop vs Julie Pontiff / Deanna Deorio6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Willoughby / Fernanda Jacques vs Gretchen Morrison / Ericka Beck5-7, 1-6
2021-06-21vs CK REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Means / Susan Conroy vs Sandra Tate / Amanda Halsey6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicole Manutes vs Valere Mathis7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Lathrop / Diane Willoughby vs Kerri Luther / Kerry Barker6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErin Barnett / Michelle Ziemian vs Jennifer Dawe / Jennifer Gilliland6-1, 6-4
2021-06-15vs HW REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesFernanda Jacques / Debbie Lathrop vs Ginny Karlberg / Kathleen Goldy6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnita Burns / Erin Barnett vs Tina Parks / Vicki Sutherland3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDiane Willoughby / Michelle Ziemian vs Amy Kinney / Polly Cantor6-0, 6-4
2021-06-07vs LEBTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Conroy / Anne Means vs Shastin Hunzicker / Sally Pearson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesFernanda Jacques vs Leslie DeVilliers3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJody Dart / Terri Jennings vs Denise van Essen / Hanne Schauer6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Gregg / Diane Willoughby vs Carole Dagnon / Christie Bianco3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Debbie Lathrop
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.85
Michelle Ziemian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Stacy Gregg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Nicole Manutes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Erin Barnett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Anita Burns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Fernanda Jacques
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Jody Dart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Diane Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Susan Conroy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Anne Means
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Terri Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Conroy + Debbie Lathrop11557% games+7.0% vs expected
Susan Conroy + Terri Jennings6263% games+5.0% vs expected
Michelle Ziemian + Erin Barnett352056% games+3.8% vs expected
Nicole Manutes + Diane Willoughby3350% games+2.0% vs expected
Terri Jennings + Jody Dart321656% games+1.9% vs expected
Susan Conroy + Diane Willoughby3543% games+1.8% vs expected
Stacy Gregg + Jody Dart4358% games+1.6% vs expected
Stacy Gregg + Diane Willoughby3551% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debbie Lathrop
131W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
4.12
4
Michelle Ziemian
115W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Stacy Gregg
73W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Nicole Manutes
99W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Erin Barnett
91W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Anita Burns
70W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Fernanda Jacques
42W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Jody Dart
111W–88L career · 3 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Diane Willoughby
34W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Susan Conroy
77W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anne Means
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Terri Jennings
49W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.