Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0B

2022 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-22vs GREENBROOK RS 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Leeds / Lixia Lake vs Wendy Burman / Kathlyn Powers6-1, 6-1
2022-05-15vs BERKELEY TC 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Fan / Tracy Leeds vs Sandra Diliberto / Jennifer Leebove6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesDiane Mar / Tracy Leeds vs Sophia Fujioka / Teresa King6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Doan / Tracy Leeds vs Robin Elawady / Linda Wang6-4, 6-1
2022-04-02vs BERKELEY TC 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Leeds / Julia Fan vs Monica Chase / Ellen Carlton3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Leeds / Bonnie Briggs-Ramm vs Pam King Palitz / Anne Neckar6-3, 7-5
2022-03-22vs PLEASANTON 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Fan / Tracy Leeds vs Holli Strain / Janet Ward6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tracy Leeds
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.85
Nancy Doan
published
3.79
Ariane Sanders
published 4
3.73
Sally Fitzhugh
published
3.66
Cecile Chenevey
published 4
3.64
Stephanie Shapiro
published
3.61
Susan Aneja
published
3.52
Fran Hazell
published 4
3.37
Gail Pearson
published 4
3.14
Bonnie Briggs-Ramm
published 3.5
2.93
Maria Chiang
published
Jessie Du
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Leeds
96W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Nancy Doan
19W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Ariane Sanders
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Sally Fitzhugh
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cecile Chenevey
17W–22L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Stephanie Shapiro
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
Susan Aneja
35W–30L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Fran Hazell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Gail Pearson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.37
3.5
Bonnie Briggs-Ramm
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Maria Chiang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jessie Du
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.