Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 55AW8.0A

2022 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
W#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Amanda Kao vs Stacy Reitmeir / Pamela Schmidt6-3, 6-4
2022-05-29vs ALPINE HILLS 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLona Means / Janet Tallett vs Megan O'Reilly-Lewis / Heather Wolfe6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanet Tallett / Amanda Kao vs Ellen Hilbrich / Yuri Oda7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLona Means / Janet Tallett vs Lauren Denenberg / Amy Clark1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-07vs PENINSULA TC 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Whelan / Janet Tallett vs Linda Benvenuto / Sheila Higgins Druskin7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Kao / Janet Tallett vs Stephanie Friend / Lorelei Russell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-24vs ALPINE HILLS 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Greta Waterman vs Michele Madansky / Heather Wolfe6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2022-04-13vs CUPERTINO SC 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Kristina Weaver vs Sharada Labadie / Irene Nishimoto6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJanet Tallett / Gabrielle Whelan vs Nancy Doan / Teri Parekh4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Tallett / Isabelle Fateh vs Volga B Calvello / Leslie Francis6-3, 6-1
2022-03-27vs ARAGON HS 55AW8.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Leong-Ping / Janet Tallett vs Linda S Walker / Karen Pacheco7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aina Lu
published 4.5
3.90
Junko Ohoka
published
3.80
Lori Cruz-Spray
published
3.78
Kristina Weaver
published
3.75
Christine Choye
published 4
3.72
Janet Tallett
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
3.70
Sophia Fujioka
published
3.65
Isabelle Fateh
published 4
3.63
Amanda Kao
published 4
3.56
Janet Oshiro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Fujioka + Isabelle Fateh5253% games+4.4% vs expected
Lori Cruz-Spray + Junko Ohoka033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aina Lu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Junko Ohoka
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Lori Cruz-Spray
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Kristina Weaver
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Christine Choye
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Janet Tallett
91W–65L career · 11 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Sophia Fujioka
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Isabelle Fateh
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Amanda Kao
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Janet Oshiro
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.