Teams

EPU

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-30vs Qualifying Team 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesAndy Darilek / Ray Loomis vs Ron Pearson / Jill Mattie4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCamilla McCullough / Laury Sealey vs Douglas Gilsdorf / Jackie Lloyd Randolfi6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Leaverton / Kelly Dennehy vs Misuk Kim / George Schmalz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-29vs Qualifying Team 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Leaverton / Kelly Dennehy vs Ron Pearson / Jill Mattie1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Darilek / Ray Loomis vs Douglas Gilsdorf / Jackie Lloyd Randolfi6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaury Sealey / Camilla McCullough vs George Schmalz / Misuk Kim6-2, 6-0
2021-05-29vs Qualifying Team 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCamilla McCullough / Laury Sealey vs Jackie Lloyd Randolfi / Ron Pearson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Dennehy / Robert Leaverton vs Jill Mattie / Douglas Gilsdorf4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndy Darilek / Ray Loomis vs George Schmalz / Misuk Kim6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Camilla McCullough
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Andy Darilek
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kelly Dennehy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laury Sealey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ray Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Leaverton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Loomis + Andy Darilek213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Leaverton + Kelly Dennehy123 matchesnot enough data
Camilla McCullough + Laury Sealey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Camilla McCullough
5W–11L career · type T · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Andy Darilek
2W–1L career · type T · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Dennehy
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laury Sealey
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ray Loomis
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Leaverton
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.