Teams

Qualifying Team 6.0

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-30vs EPUWon 21
W#1 DoublesRon Pearson / Jill Mattie vs Andy Darilek / Ray Loomis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDouglas Gilsdorf / Jackie Lloyd Randolfi vs Camilla McCullough / Laury Sealey3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Leaverton / Kelly Dennehy vs Misuk Kim / George Schmalz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-29vs EPULost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Leaverton / Kelly Dennehy vs Ron Pearson / Jill Mattie1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Gilsdorf / Jackie Lloyd Randolfi vs Andy Darilek / Ray Loomis3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge Schmalz / Misuk Kim vs Laury Sealey / Camilla McCullough2-6, 0-6
2021-05-29vs EPULost 12
W#1 DoublesJackie Lloyd Randolfi / Ron Pearson vs Camilla McCullough / Laury Sealey4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Dennehy / Robert Leaverton vs Jill Mattie / Douglas Gilsdorf4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGeorge Schmalz / Misuk Kim vs Andy Darilek / Ray Loomis0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jackie Lloyd Randolfi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Douglas Gilsdorf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
George Schmalz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Mattie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Misuk Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Leaverton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ron Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misuk Kim + George Schmalz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jackie Lloyd Randolfi
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Douglas Gilsdorf
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
George Schmalz
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jill Mattie
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Misuk Kim
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Leaverton
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ron Pearson
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.