Teams

Van Dyke Farms - P. Moore

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-13vs TYCC Yachty By Nature - L. DavittWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Moore / Stephanie van Brocklin vs Erica Brandon / Ali Garrity6-4, 6-4
2023-11-06vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie van Brocklin / Lindsay Williams vs AMY ISAAC / Sandra Bell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-10-30vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - N. EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonika Leon / Stephanie van Brocklin vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesStephanie van Brocklin / Kathleen Roberts vs Julie Sayer / Erin Braga7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie van Brocklin vs Cille Williams6-2, 6-2
2023-09-11vs Avila - A. StaffordWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie van Brocklin / Michelle Mcclendon vs Nicole Hasselbach / Erica Paradise6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Stephanie van Brocklin
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Kathleen Roberts
published
2.98
Audrey Kessler
published 3
2.81
Michelle Barry
published
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
2.79
Wendy Corn
published
2.77
Pamela Moore
published
2.66
Monika Leon
published
2.55
Karen Sanford
published
2.52
Cherie Adkins
published 3
2.40
Bridget Harrison
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Moore + Karen Sanford213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Barry + Wendy Corn213 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Kessler + Stephanie van Brocklin213 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Kessler + Kathleen Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephanie van Brocklin
155W–79L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Kathleen Roberts
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Audrey Kessler
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Michelle Barry
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Wendy Corn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Pamela Moore
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Monika Leon
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Karen Sanford
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Cherie Adkins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Bridget Harrison
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.