Teams

Team John

Men 2026 Combo Social League - Spring · 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-04vs Team AllenWon 30
W#1 Male DoublesKenneth Gutsch / James Robinson vs Joe Buckwalter / Douglas Bliss6-3, 6-0
W#2 Male DoublesJohn Suddock / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian vs Noah Whitney / Eric Jostsons5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 Male DoublesMatthew Korshin / Krisada Meephothong vs Matthew Hayes / James Foster6-0, 6-1
2026-04-04vs Team AllenSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesDaniel Whitfield / Korben Senden vs Noah Whitney / Levi Patterson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 Male DoublesKorey Perry / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian vs Elliott Hoel / Eric Jostsons7-5, 6-3
2026-03-29vs Team AllenWon 21
L#1 Male DoublesJames Robinson / Korben Senden vs Joe Buckwalter / Douglas Bliss4-6, 3-6
W#2 Male DoublesBrenden Raymond-Yakoubian / John Suddock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 Male DoublesEd Ulman / Krisada Meephothong vs Elliott Hoel / James Foster6-1, 6-2
2026-03-28vs Team AllenWon 30
W#1 Male DoublesJames Robinson / Daniel Whitfield vs Joe Buckwalter / Bryan Martin6-4, 6-4
W#2 Male DoublesBrenden Raymond-Yakoubian / Korben Senden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 Male DoublesKrisada Meephothong / Ed Ulman vs James Foster / Elliott Hoel6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
James Robinson
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Daniel Whitfield
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Korben Senden
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #2 Male Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian
usually #2 Male Doubles 75%, also #3 Male Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Matthew Korshin
usually #3 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.61
Krisada Meephothong
usually #3 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Ed Ulman
usually #3 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
John Suddock
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published
Korey Perry
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Robinson
42W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Daniel Whitfield
58W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.66
Korben Senden
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.33
3
Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian
22W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
2.5
Matthew Korshin
17W–19L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.98
2.5
Krisada Meephothong
35W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
2.5
Ed Ulman
17W–52L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
John Suddock
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Korey Perry
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.