Teams

Team Allen

Men 2026 Combo Social League - Spring · 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.31 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-04vs Team JohnLost 03
L#1 Male DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Douglas Bliss vs Kenneth Gutsch / James Robinson3-6, 0-6
L#2 Male DoublesNoah Whitney / Eric Jostsons vs John Suddock / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 Male DoublesMatthew Hayes / James Foster vs Matthew Korshin / Krisada Meephothong0-6, 1-6
2026-04-04vs Team JohnWon 21
W#1 Male DoublesNoah Whitney / Levi Patterson vs Daniel Whitfield / Korben Senden1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 Male DoublesDouglas Bliss / Matthew Hayes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 Male DoublesElliott Hoel / Eric Jostsons vs Korey Perry / Brenden Raymond-Yakoubian5-7, 3-6
2026-03-29vs Team JohnSplit 11
W#1 Male DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Douglas Bliss vs James Robinson / Korben Senden6-4, 6-3
L#3 Male DoublesElliott Hoel / James Foster vs Ed Ulman / Krisada Meephothong1-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs Team JohnLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Bryan Martin vs James Robinson / Daniel Whitfield4-6, 4-6
L#3 Male DoublesJames Foster / Elliott Hoel vs Krisada Meephothong / Ed Ulman1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Allen Clendaniel
published 4
3.70
Joe Buckwalter
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Levi Patterson
published
3.13
Eric Jostsons
usually #2 Male Doubles 50%, also #3 Male Doubles 50% · published 3
3.12
Noah Whitney
usually #2 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Bryan Martin
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Douglas Bliss
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #2 Male Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.20
Elliott Hoel
usually #3 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
James Foster
usually #3 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allen Clendaniel
84W–53L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Joe Buckwalter
88W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Levi Patterson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
3
Eric Jostsons
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Noah Whitney
5W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Bryan Martin
37W–22L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Douglas Bliss
52W–43L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.79
2.5
Elliott Hoel
3W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
James Foster
2W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.