Teams

Mechanicsburg - Landis

2022 USTA 55 & Over League · 8.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-17vs Hershey CC - WolfeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Carson / C Fridirici vs Robert McCormack / James Schmidt7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerry Farley / Jenks Landis vs Wilson Wolfe / Jacek Krzeminski6-2, 6-1
2022-07-10vs LTYC - CookLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Carson / Bruce Brandler vs Webb Cook / Bernard Ilkhanoff3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Farley / Jim Ketelesleger vs David Jemison / Paul Dano1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBryan Perry / Jenks Landis vs Steve Staman / Dwayne Dimitris6-3, 7-5
2022-06-26vs West Shore - EckhausLost 12
L#1 DoublesBryan Perry / James Carson vs MARK VOGEL / Robert Lentz6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenks Landis / Marc Baxley vs Jeff Brent / Steve Price6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeo Washburn / Chris Gouse vs Mel Eckhaus / RANDY SHEAFFER6-0, 6-3
2022-06-12vs LTYC - CookLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarc Oberholtzer / James Carson vs Joseph Donell / Stephen Nichols6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeo Washburn / Chris Gouse vs David Jemison / Paul Dano5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJenks Landis / Bruce Brandler vs Steve Staman / Dwayne Dimitris6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-22vs RCW - Don't be a DeuceWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarc Oberholtzer / Bryan Perry vs Peter Dodd / Wilson Pipkin7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeo Washburn / Chris Gouse vs Gustavo Pilarte / Scott Cutright7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNeil Boyd / Jenks Landis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-16vs West Shore - EckhausWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Farley / C Fridirici vs Steven Zerby / Tomas Lee4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeo Washburn / Chris Gouse vs MARK VOGEL / RANDY SHEAFFER6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarc Baxley / Bruce Brandler vs Stephen Herzenberg / Michael Larsen6-1, 6-3
2022-05-15vs YACTA - MoyerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeo Washburn / Jack Snavely vs Philippe du Bois / Cory Barnes7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Ketelesleger / James Carson vs David Heinzelmann / Gregory Bankert4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RCW - Don't be a Deuce0103638
2LTYC - Cook0611716147
3YACTA - Moyer069920158
4Hershey CC - Wolfe0631530202
5Mechanicsburg - Landis07111020171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Neil Boyd
published
Bryan Perry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Marc Oberholtzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Jenks Landis
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.71
Leo Washburn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bruce Brandler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Chris Gouse
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
C Fridirici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Snavely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
James Carson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jim Ketelesleger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Baxley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Terry Farley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leo Washburn + Chris Gouse16657% games+0.0% vs expected
Chris Gouse + Jenks Landis6157% gamesnot enough data
Bryan Perry + Jenks Landis4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neil Boyd
65W–29L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bryan Perry
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Marc Oberholtzer
65W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Jenks Landis
120W–79L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Leo Washburn
120W–69L career · 12 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Bruce Brandler
5W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Chris Gouse
167W–107L career · 18 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
C Fridirici
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jack Snavely
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
James Carson
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Ketelesleger
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Baxley
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Farley
51W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.