Teams

FIT:Not My Fault:Jumper/Mulvehill

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 3.0 W 5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-06vs 4S:Kicking Aces:Tuohy/DurdenWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Olschofka / Sarah Morrison vs Mandi Schmauch / Grayson Rueckert6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCaroline Ferson vs amanda kaslowitz4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Cook / Maria Niznansky vs Haiku Durden / Hillary Mcgrail6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Mulvehill / Lauren Jumper vs Anne Marcus / Sara Ezrin6-0, 6-0
2026-02-06vs MRC:Sets and the City:Bruck/KellyWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmma Kaye / Mary Orecchio vs Jennifer Seislove / Megan Darragh6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Young / Maria Niznansky vs Denise DeMarco / Agni Pavlidou Kyprianou6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Fahey / Emilie Schneider vs Jacquelyn Deflumeri / Kristin McCarthy6-1, 6-4
2026-01-30vs TCT:Dare Doubles:Nelson/HawkeWon 40
W#1 DoublesCaroline Ferson / Catherine Young vs Carol Levarek / Janette Lichaw6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMary Orecchio vs Heather Nelson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmma Griffin / Kim Fahey vs Jill Farruggio / Lisa VanZyl7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Cook / Emilie Schneider vs Suzanne Adams / Christine Kay6-0, 6-1
2026-01-16vs 4S:Kicking Aces:Tuohy/DurdenWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Ferson / Sarah Morrison vs Paula Park / Ellen Conklin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Orecchio / Emma Kaye vs Mandi Schmauch / Grayson Rueckert6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Niznansky / Kim Fahey vs Anne Marcus / Wendy Murphy6-4, 6-1
2025-12-12vs MRC:Sets and the City:Bruck/KellyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Ferson / Catherine Young vs Nancy Picard / Jennifer Seislove6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMaria Niznansky vs Kristin McCarthy6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Orecchio / Emma Griffin vs Chris Bruck / Erin Benvegnu6-0, 6-2
2025-11-21vs WRC:Volley Girls:WoolvertonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmma Kaye / Rachel Olschofka vs Kelly Fagan / Lauren Zirn2-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Jumper / Mary Orecchio vs Melissa Walker / Hiam Asmar1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-22vs WRC:Volley Girls:WoolvertonWon 31
L#1 DoublesMary Orecchio / Emma Kaye vs Anna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Olschofka vs Mariette Solleveld6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Fahey / Catherine Young vs Hiam Asmar / Jacqueline Passios1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Morrison / Leahkay White vs April Lebowitz / Pamela Fliegelman6-1, 6-3
2025-10-09vs MRC:Sets and the City:Bruck/KellyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Olschofka / Emma Kaye vs Jennifer Seislove / Jacqueline Mulhall6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Morrison / Kim Fahey vs Rina McNamara / Rachel Simms7-5, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Jumper / Emilie Schneider vs Stacy Walton / Jacquelyn Deflumeri6-2, 6-2
2025-09-26vs 4S:Kicking Aces:Tuohy/DurdenWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Morrison / Rachel Olschofka vs Tracy Haddad / Paula Park6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria Mulvehill / Lauren Jumper vs Ellen Conklin / Kathleen Murdock2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Niznansky / Kim Fahey vs Toni Tuohy / Anne Marcus6-7, 4-2
2025-09-16vs TCT:Dare Doubles:Nelson/HawkeWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Olschofka / Mary Orecchio vs Christine Kay / Ellen Lewis6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMaria Niznansky vs Heather Nelson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Jumper / Emma Griffin vs Jill Farruggio / Lisa VanZyl6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEmilie Schneider / Leahkay White vs Janette Lichaw / Cindy Smith1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · 3.0 W 5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC: Ball Busters:Casey01033515240
2FIT:Not My Fault:Jumper/Mulvehill01030723238
3SOL:Slammers:Muslim/Klein010261027269
4GCC:Yantz Supertars:Yantz010281229284
5CP:Serves You Right:Mostofi010261330291
6CP:Tennis Junkies:Neyer/Otis010251533313
7NC: 18 :Foley010221737340
8CP:Over Served:Brown/Masters010211738364
9IA: Overserved:Lange010251538328
10OGT:Kiss My Ace:Aronson/Dyer010221840330
11KH:Racquettes:MacLane010211841316
12CP:Serves You Right:Marra/Smith010181842379
13INT:All Set:Seigner/Donnelly010221843340
14GRC:3.0:Leon/Campo010211843327
15OGT:Happy Hitters:Brook/Vranos010191944335
16IA:Jammers:Huang/Haight010172045358
174S:Tempest:O'Brien010172148370
18IA: Not Sorry: Musicaro010172349376
19INT:Sweet Slices:Murray010192150375
20NC:Get A Grip:Jenkins/Abdelwahab010132658413
21MRC:Sets and the City:Bruck/Kelly010102858417
22NC:Aces Up:Doughney/Visokey01093063425
23NC:Racquettes:Kittredge01063269442
24KH:Sets in the City:Cadsawan01063369442
254S:Route 7 Honkers:Cooper/Roos01053470438

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Caroline Ferson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Rachel Olschofka
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.03
Lauren Jumper
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Mary Orecchio
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.96
Emma Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Emma Kaye
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Maria Niznansky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.72
Kim Fahey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Emilie Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leahkay White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Mulvehill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Orecchio + Emma Kaye8258% games+4.3% vs expected
Maria Mulvehill + Lauren Jumper5450% games+2.1% vs expected
Kim Fahey + Maria Niznansky213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Fahey + Emma Griffin303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Jumper + Emilie Schneider213 matchesnot enough data
Emma Griffin + Emilie Schneider213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Ferson
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Rachel Olschofka
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Lauren Jumper
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Mary Orecchio
15W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Emma Griffin
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Emma Kaye
15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Maria Niznansky
11W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Kim Fahey
29W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Emilie Schneider
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Leahkay White
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Mulvehill
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.