Teams

OGT:Kiss My Ace:Aronson/Dyer

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 3.0 W 5

23 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-19vs NC:Aces Up:Doughney/VisokeySplit 22
W#1 DoublesPuja Chandiramani / Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt vs Sonia Friedman / Lindsay Rosen6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Paxton vs Nina Doughney2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan McFarland / Kelly Walsh vs Erica Visokey / Melanie Chen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Martin / Jenny Marinak vs Teresa Shafir / Caroline Smit6-0, 6-1
2026-01-27vs NC: 18 :FoleyWon 31
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Meghan Rossi vs Jennifer Hayes / Holly Brittain1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPaisley Fenyes vs Joanne Russo-Cain6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenny Marinak / Emily Tisdale vs Kim Biltoft / Jill Martin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShrujal Baxi / Diane Martin vs Kristen Skarvelis / Melina Hamza-Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-15vs OGT:OGTAgonals:WreschnerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMeghan Rossi / Katie Glorieux vs Julia Stratoudakis / Bonnie Wreschner7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Paxton vs Cynthia Goodstein6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMegan McFarland / Diane Martin vs Julie Christie / Katerina Donovan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLuiza Comparini / Kelly Walsh vs Kimberly Ball / Marisa Geddo6-3, 6-4
2025-12-02vs NC:Aces Up:Doughney/VisokeyWon 40
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Kristin Martinez vs Karen Gallagher / Sandra Rose7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLuiza Comparini vs Nina Doughney4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaisley Fenyes / Megan McFarland vs Sonia Friedman / Teresa Shafir6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Paxton / Kelly Walsh vs Susan Doshi / Caroline Smit6-1, 6-0
2025-12-01vs IA: Not Sorry: MusicaroSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKatie Glorieux / Meghan Rossi vs Whitney Oconnor / Cecilia Piszak1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesSophie Sandford vs Kim Field6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Ghada Jabbour vs Elizabeth Bourgoin / Vera Musicaro0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMegan McFarland / Emily Tisdale vs Maria Musante / Alexis Reid6-4, 6-2
2025-11-21vs GRC:3.0:Leon/CampoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLea Loveland / Eleanor DeLeo vs Lauren Mattson / Lauren Solimando6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Paxton vs Chantal Adair2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMegan McFarland / Jenny Marinak vs Heather Khuu / Erikka Coppel2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Tormey / Jamie Leahy vs Lilian Limon / Alexandra Balic6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs NC: 18 :FoleySplit 22
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Aronson / Sophie Sandford vs Jennifer Hayes / Leslie Gavin6-4, 6-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Walsh vs Shirley Xu-Weldon3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEleanor DeLeo / Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt vs Kim Biltoft / Jill Martin6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDanielle Tormey / Nicole Paxton vs Melina Hamza-Smith / Holly Brittain4-6, 0-6
2025-10-14vs IA: Not Sorry: MusicaroSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Bianchi / Katie Glorieux vs Cecilia Piszak / Whitney Oconnor2-6, 1-2
L#1 SinglesNicole Paxton vs Michelle Mallol4-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesMegan McFarland / Kelly Walsh vs Lea Russell / Jessica Basham6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLea Loveland / Diane Martin vs Kristin Connell / Caity Lischick6-0, 6-1
2025-09-30vs GRC:3.0:Leon/CampoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Paisley Fenyes vs Chantal Adair / KRISTIANA Alyce Wilson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNicole Paxton vs Michelle Fisher1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan McFarland / Kelly Walsh vs Inga Skuratovsky / Lauren Solimando7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanielle Tormey / Emily Tisdale vs Caroline Paradiso / Marcela Cali Mandava6-2, 6-4
2025-09-16vs OGT:OGTAgonals:WreschnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaisley Fenyes / Meghan Rossi vs Julie Deiters / Julie Christie6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJaclyn Aronson vs Katerina Donovan6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGeorgia Dyer / Lea Loveland vs Janine Huiskes / Melissa Roth1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEleanor DeLeo / Emily Tisdale vs Julia Stratoudakis / Bonnie Wreschner7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · 3.0 W 5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC: Ball Busters:Casey01033515240
2FIT:Not My Fault:Jumper/Mulvehill01030723238
3SOL:Slammers:Muslim/Klein010261027269
4GCC:Yantz Supertars:Yantz010281229284
5CP:Serves You Right:Mostofi010261330291
6CP:Tennis Junkies:Neyer/Otis010251533313
7NC: 18 :Foley010221737340
8CP:Over Served:Brown/Masters010211738364
9IA: Overserved:Lange010251538328
10OGT:Kiss My Ace:Aronson/Dyer010221840330
11KH:Racquettes:MacLane010211841316
12CP:Serves You Right:Marra/Smith010181842379
13INT:All Set:Seigner/Donnelly010221843340
14GRC:3.0:Leon/Campo010211843327
15OGT:Happy Hitters:Brook/Vranos010191944335
16IA:Jammers:Huang/Haight010172045358
174S:Tempest:O'Brien010172148370
18IA: Not Sorry: Musicaro010172349376
19INT:Sweet Slices:Murray010192150375
20NC:Get A Grip:Jenkins/Abdelwahab010132658413
21MRC:Sets and the City:Bruck/Kelly010102858417
22NC:Aces Up:Doughney/Visokey01093063425
23NC:Racquettes:Kittredge01063269442
24KH:Sets in the City:Cadsawan01063369442
254S:Route 7 Honkers:Cooper/Roos01053470438

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Sophie Sandford
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.07
Luiza Comparini
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Kristin Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Kelly Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Lea Loveland
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Danielle Tormey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Mary Bianchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Jaclyn Aronson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Puja Chandiramani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Katie Glorieux
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Paisley Fenyes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Eleanor DeLeo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Jenny Marinak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Georgia Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Meghan Rossi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Megan McFarland
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.78
Emily Tisdale
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Nicole Paxton
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.63
Ghada Jabbour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Shrujal Baxi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Leahy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Bellmare
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgia Dyer + Kristin Martinez5167% games+12.6% vs expected
Jaclyn Aronson + Meghan Rossi9357% games+9.1% vs expected
Jaclyn Aronson + Georgia Dyer5158% games+8.9% vs expected
Paisley Fenyes + Katie Glorieux4262% games+8.3% vs expected
Ghada Jabbour + Sophie Sandford1645% games+2.6% vs expected
Jaclyn Aronson + Kristin Martinez6159% games+2.5% vs expected
Georgia Dyer + Meghan Rossi4550% games+0.5% vs expected
Paisley Fenyes + Mary Bianchi4155% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Sandford
35W–38L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Luiza Comparini
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Kristin Martinez
28W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kelly Walsh
26W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Lea Loveland
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Danielle Tormey
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mary Bianchi
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jaclyn Aronson
52W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Puja Chandiramani
59W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Katie Glorieux
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Paisley Fenyes
125W–92L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Eleanor DeLeo
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jenny Marinak
27W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt
31W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Georgia Dyer
29W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Meghan Rossi
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Megan McFarland
33W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Emily Tisdale
37W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Nicole Paxton
12W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Ghada Jabbour
41W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Shrujal Baxi
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jamie Leahy
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katie Bellmare
35W–50L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.