Teams

HMTC CRIMSON

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs LVTA NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Mischel Ebon Libunao vs Linda Miller / Carol Propst4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolina Moore vs Cathy Graves6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Holland / LeAnne Collins vs Jennifer Schafer / Dawn Hagen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLynn Arenson / Ginger Victor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-11vs CSU GOLDWon 40
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Carolina Moore vs D'Ann Rhoda / Jean Taaffe6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Alanna Williams7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnita Helin / Debbie Neumaier vs Jan Keefe / Laurel McClellan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Holland / Sarah Smith vs Janet Kerrigan / Laura Powers6-1, 6-2
2022-07-07vs MLF REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesErin Livingstone / Gail Draper vs SeonAh Kendall / Sara Chan7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLynn Arenson vs Becca Fitzpatrick0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeAnne Collins / Renee Carlson vs Lisa Golicher / Bethany Seely4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelley Hoime / Mischel Ebon Libunao vs Dina Rank / Jennifer Poznanovic7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs FCCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGail Draper / Debbie Neumaier vs Robin Bachelet / Lynette Krueger6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarolina Moore vs Jill Hartman6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRenee Carlson / Mischel Ebon Libunao vs Patti Helper / Dierdre Sadeh3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGinger Victor / Debra Lukasiewicz vs Amy Anderson / Linda Abercrombie0-6, 2-6
2022-06-13vs LVTA NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarolina Moore / Mischel Ebon Libunao vs Ellen Laubhan / Anne Moore3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKathy Jacobson vs Linda Miller6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGail Draper / Erin Livingstone vs Laurie Yeager / Carol Propst7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Arenson / Kelley Hoime vs Dawn Hagen / Jennifer Schafer6-1, 7-6
2022-06-06vs CSU GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarolina Moore / Mischel Ebon Libunao vs Tonya Motley / Kim Phillips6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLynn Arenson vs Alanna Williams6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Holland / Sarah Smith vs Wendy Clark / Laurel McClellan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnita Helin / Debbie Neumaier vs Catherine Costlow / Karen Chancellor6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Gail Draper
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.00
Debbie Neumaier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Lynn Arenson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Carolina Moore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
Anita Helin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Kelley Hoime
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Kathy Jacobson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Erin Livingstone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Susan Holland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Ginger Victor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debra Lukasiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
LeAnne Collins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mischel Ebon Libunao
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Draper + Debbie Neumaier13362% games+9.8% vs expected
Mischel Ebon Libunao + Carolina Moore2453% games+3.4% vs expected
LeAnne Collins + Kelley Hoime2646% games−2.0% vs expected
Gail Draper + Carolina Moore10655% games−4.2% vs expected
Susan Holland + Erin Livingstone1741% games−5.4% vs expected
Kelley Hoime + Carolina Moore3254% gamesnot enough data
Anita Helin + Debbie Neumaier5070% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Victor + Kelley Hoime123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gail Draper
154W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.10
4
Debbie Neumaier
57W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Lynn Arenson
84W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Carolina Moore
90W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Anita Helin
25W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kelley Hoime
46W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kathy Jacobson
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Erin Livingstone
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Susan Holland
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ginger Victor
42W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Debra Lukasiewicz
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
LeAnne Collins
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mischel Ebon Libunao
16W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.