Teams

MLF RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 4.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-11vs LVTA NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesBecca Fitzpatrick / Cathy Thomas vs Laurie Yeager / Carol Propst6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSara Chan vs Anne Moore4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTaylor Montey / Dina Rank vs Becky Olson / Jennifer Schafer6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Golicher / Patti Lang vs Linda Miller / Dawn Hagen6-1, 7-6
2022-07-08vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesLorena Laffitte vs Tracy Kerr3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Montey / Jennifer Poznanovic vs Patti Helper / April Walden1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatti Lang / Rebecca Tatman vs Julia Tynan / Elaine Valenza6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-07vs HMTC CRIMSONWon 31
W#1 DoublesSeonAh Kendall / Sara Chan vs Erin Livingstone / Gail Draper6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBecca Fitzpatrick vs Lynn Arenson6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Golicher / Bethany Seely vs LeAnne Collins / Renee Carlson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDina Rank / Jennifer Poznanovic vs Kelley Hoime / Mischel Ebon Libunao6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-27vs FCCCLost 13
L#1 DoublesCathy Thomas / Bethany Seely vs Patti Helper / Amanda Repert6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSara Chan vs Tracy Kerr3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Tatman / Patti Lang vs April Walden / Linda Abercrombie3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDina Rank / Jennifer Poznanovic vs Robin Bachelet / Julia Tynan1-6, 5-7
2022-06-20vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelissa Seager / Sara Chan vs Janet Kerrigan / Karen Chancellor6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLorena Laffitte vs Kim Phillips0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Golicher / SeonAh Kendall vs Tonya Motley / Julie Walker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Tatman / Cathy Thomas vs Mary Beth McCubbin / Wendy Schaffer6-3, 6-2
2022-06-06vs LVTA NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesSara Chan / SeonAh Kendall vs Sheri Foster / Laurie Yeager6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLorena Laffitte vs Cathy Graves6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCathy Thomas / Bethany Seely vs Becky Olson / Carol Propst6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDina Rank / Taylor Montey vs Sharon Buccino / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Becca Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Sara Chan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.97
Cathy Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Bethany Seely
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Lorena Laffitte
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.75
SeonAh Kendall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dina Rank
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Melissa Seager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Rebecca Tatman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jennifer Poznanovic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Golicher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patti Lang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Montey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SeonAh Kendall + Cathy Thomas2356% games+5.0% vs expected
Melissa Seager + Bethany Seely3455% games−0.1% vs expected
SeonAh Kendall + Rebecca Tatman2546% gamesnot enough data
Becca Fitzpatrick + Melissa Seager5073% gamesnot enough data
SeonAh Kendall + Sara Chan314 matchesnot enough data
Bethany Seely + Cathy Thomas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Becca Fitzpatrick
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Chan
40W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
4.11
4
Cathy Thomas
39W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Bethany Seely
76W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Lorena Laffitte
19W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
SeonAh Kendall
74W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dina Rank
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Melissa Seager
40W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Rebecca Tatman
47W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Poznanovic
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Golicher
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Lang
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Taylor Montey
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.