Teams

Eagan/McElreath 55s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-09vs Brown K. 55s 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesYvonne Singh / Linda Hall vs Ann Evans / Minerva Loran3-6, 5-7
2022-04-25vs Smith 55s 4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Hall / Gwenda Priest vs Nancye Milam / Aprille Black6-0, 6-3
2022-04-18vs Kincaid/Calkins 55s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Hall / Gwenda Priest vs Becky Kincaid / Suzanne Johnson6-3, 6-3
2022-04-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Hall / Lynn Jacoby vs Kathy Brown / Kathy Pace7-5, 6-4
2022-03-28vs McKenzie 55s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Hall / Debbie Shiflet vs Jaime Hendricks / Gina Kinard7-5, 6-1
2022-03-15vs Dunbar 55s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Gwenda Priest vs Kari Craig / Katie Ballard6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Lynn Jacoby
published
3.63
Yvonne Singh
published
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
3.41
Chris Amos
published 4
3.37
Suzanne Rudy
published
3.29
Debbie Shiflet
published 3.5
Debbie Lane
published 3.5
2.92
Cindy McElreath
published 3.5
Linda Hall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Rudy + Lynn Jacoby224 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Shiflet + Cindy McElreath123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Jacoby
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Yvonne Singh
13W–2L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Chris Amos
5W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.41
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.37
3.5
Debbie Shiflet
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Debbie Lane
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cindy McElreath
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.