Teams

Kincaid/Calkins 55s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-09vs McKenzie 55s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Jean Nelson / Libby Strickland vs Dell Barbee / Marsha Tice6-4, 6-3
2022-04-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Mary Jean Nelson vs Cindy Thomas / Leah Price6-2, 6-2
2022-04-11vs Brown K. 55s 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLibby Strickland / Kathy Cross vs Mary Ann Nixon / Minerva Loran6-4, 7-5
2022-04-04vs McKenzie 55s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Mary Jean Nelson vs Marsha Tice / Dell Barbee3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-28vs Smith 55s 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Kathryn Michaud vs Kelly Miller / Caroline McAlister5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-14vs Eagan/McElreath 55s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Mary Jean Nelson vs Jean Eagan / Lynn Chafin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.31
Martha Cox
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.25
Susan Calkins
published
Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
2.89
Missy Chance
published
2.86
Beverly Burke
published 3
Jennie Pekarne
published
Mary Jean Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Calkins + Becky Kincaid303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Martha Cox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Susan Calkins
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Becky Kincaid
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Missy Chance
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Beverly Burke
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jennie Pekarne
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jean Nelson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.