Teams

CM RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-24vs TTA GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Mullen / Jack Tighe vs Paul Swanson / Rodney Gill5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDennis Miceli / David Milliken vs Michael King / Rob Traver6-2, 6-3
2021-04-10vs CACM REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDennis Miceli / Joseph Mullen vs Andy Weiss / Dwight Smith6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJack Tighe vs Kyle Evashevski0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Milliken / Steve Gonzales vs Christopher Gilbert / Peter Graham6-3, 6-2
2021-04-03vs TTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Gonzales / Jack Tighe vs Paul Lesh / Michael King6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDavid Milliken vs Michael Ely1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Mullen / Paul Tighe vs Paul Swanson / Rob Traver6-4, 6-3
2021-03-27vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Tighe / Joseph Mullen vs Rick Bonczynski / Jamie Harvey4-6, 3-6
2021-03-20vs CACM REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Mullen / Dennis Miceli vs Kyle Evashevski / Jay Logan0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Tighe / Jack Tighe vs Andy Weiss / Peter Graham3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Paul Tighe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
David Milliken
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Joseph Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.65
Dennis Miceli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jack Tighe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Steve Gonzales
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Tighe + Joseph Mullen211553% games+3.3% vs expected
Paul Tighe + Jack Tighe1539% games−10.2% vs expected
Dennis Miceli + Joseph Mullen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Paul Tighe
61W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
David Milliken
31W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
Joseph Mullen
61W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Dennis Miceli
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Jack Tighe
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Gonzales
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.