Teams

CACM RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-24vs NJ BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJay Logan / Kyle Evashevski vs Martin Wong / Michael Schirmacher6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Gilbert / Dwight Smith vs Rick Bonczynski / Jeremy Wilder2-6, 0-6
2021-04-17vs TTA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Graham / Christopher Gilbert vs Rodney Gill / Paul Swanson6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJay Logan vs Michael Ely3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-10vs CM REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndy Weiss / Dwight Smith vs Dennis Miceli / Joseph Mullen3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKyle Evashevski vs Jack Tighe6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Gilbert / Peter Graham vs David Milliken / Steve Gonzales3-6, 2-6
2021-04-03vs NJ BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesKyle Evashevski / Jay Logan vs Brian Hansen / Jeff Richker6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristopher Gilbert vs Colby Kortum6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Graham / Dwight Smith vs Michael Schirmacher / Martin Wong4-6, 4-6
2021-03-27vs TTA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndy Weiss / Peter Graham vs Rodney Gill / Rob Traver3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDwight Smith vs Paul Swanson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJay Logan / Kyle Evashevski vs Michael King / Paul Lesh6-0, 6-1
2021-03-20vs CM REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKyle Evashevski / Jay Logan vs Joseph Mullen / Dennis Miceli6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristopher Gilbert vs Steve Gonzales4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Weiss / Peter Graham vs Paul Tighe / Jack Tighe6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Michael Kraft
published
3.29
Jay Logan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Christopher Gilbert
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Kyle Evashevski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.16
Dwight Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Andy Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Graham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Logan + Kyle Evashevski5085% gamesnot enough data
Dwight Smith + Michael Kraft134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Kraft
31W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%9%91%
3.67
Jay Logan
63W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Christopher Gilbert
34W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Kyle Evashevski
33W–38L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Dwight Smith
13W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Andy Weiss
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Graham
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.