Teams

Beerman Smart Aces - N. Giusto

2025 Polk TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.72 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-11vs City of WH Tennis - J. EdwardsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCassie Miller / Elisa Buffington vs Jackie Edwards / Meagan McGill6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Osborn / Deb Spears vs Elizabeth Stevenson / Denise Saltman3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrittany Craig / Allison Sorenson vs Kathy Borders / Courtney McCrystal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCassie Miller / Amanda Strawbridge vs Meriel' Peterich / Carol Gardner7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeb Spears / Krissy Heybroek vs Leslie Simmons / Ann Marie Toney6-2, 6-4
2025-07-21vs City of WH Tennis - J. EdwardsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Janet Layug vs Sonya Braudway / Denise Saltman2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Osborn / Janet Layug vs Lauren Mason / Michaela Hillenbrand6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Allison Sorenson vs Caroline Miller / Lauren Lloyd2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-30vs City of WH Tennis - J. EdwardsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCassie Miller / Amanda Strawbridge vs Briquel Joiner / Jackie Edwards6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Janet Layug - * vs Elizabeth Stevenson / Denise Saltman2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Amy Evans vs Kathy Borders / Courtney McCrystal5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesElisa Buffington / Gretchen Wood vs Ana Gillespie / Meriel' Peterich6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeb Spears / Krissy Heybroek vs Lauren Mason / Leilani Guinn6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrittany Craig / Tina Marcewicz vs Ashley Bailey / Brittany Rutherford7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Elisa Buffington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Cassie Miller
published 4
3.84
Amanda Strawbridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Deb Spears
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Janet Layug
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Gretchen Wood
published
3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
3.52
Krissy Heybroek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Brittany Craig
published 3.5
3.15
Allison Sorenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Tina Marcewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krissy Heybroek + Deb Spears21859% games+12.3% vs expected
Elisa Buffington + Cassie Miller7069% games+8.1% vs expected
Allison Sorenson + Tina Marcewicz6252% gamesnot enough data
Janet Layug + Tina Marcewicz6167% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Buffington + Krissy Heybroek4165% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Buffington + Amanda Strawbridge5068% gamesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Janet Layug5069% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Buffington + Deb Spears303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Buffington
290W–167L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Cassie Miller
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Amanda Strawbridge
114W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Deb Spears
231W–146L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Janet Layug
89W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Gretchen Wood
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Krissy Heybroek
212W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Brittany Craig
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Allison Sorenson
96W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.