Teams

NJ RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-01vs BRMST REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Wierzba / Nicole Stevens vs Melissa Rawsky / Sarah Monzyk7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Lovely vs Jennifer Cooper1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Eccles / Kasey Benedict vs Colleen Estrada / Karen Gallo4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Pinaroc vs Alden Perkins6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Kellyn Goeken vs Leslie Gaiser / Lisa Shaver6-2, 6-1
2025-05-12vs MEA NAVYWon 41
W#1 DoublesCourtney Eccles / Jacqueline Wierzba vs Kristen Stiles / Mandy Sladden6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Pinaroc vs Shannon Ross6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShelby Treloar / Terri Whitehair vs Lauren Noyes / Susan Wu6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesNicole Stevens vs Mary Sznewajs2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKasey Benedict / Kellyn Goeken vs Brendan Ash / Charity Sevian6-4, 6-2
2025-05-05vs RCC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesCourtney Eccles / Kellyn Goeken vs Elizabeth Sones / Sarah Latham3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Pinaroc vs Lindsey Little3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLesley Kuhl / Shelby Treloar vs Jenna Baesler / Lauren Richards5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Wierzba vs Felicia Fry6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristen Lovely / Kasey Benedict vs Karen Hopkinson / Meaghan Spiegel4-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs BCC ORANGEWon 50
W#1 DoublesCourtney Eccles / Kellyn Goeken vs Marissa Fahrbach / Emma Anselmi6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLauren Pinaroc vs Kirsty Jahn6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShelby Treloar / Lesley Kuhl vs Jane McKean / Nancy Wigton6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNicole Stevens vs Rebecca Kinney3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Kasey Benedict vs CAROLYN PAUL / Neylu Longoria6-1, 6-2
2025-04-21vs TTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Wierzba / Courtney Eccles vs Alecia Phillips / Grace Whitmer6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole Stevens vs Nicole Palaschak6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLesley Kuhl / Kellyn Goeken vs Meredith Griffith / Michelle Templeton6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Shelby Treloar vs Sheila Fossen / Janice Cook6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs CVTA NAVYWon 50
W#1 DoublesNicole Stevens / Jacqueline Wierzba vs Louise Fowler / Terry Tessier7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Pinaroc vs Jacqueline Rosains6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKellyn Goeken / Courtney Eccles vs Jennifer Dingman / Maggie Brubaker6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesShelby Treloar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLesley Kuhl / Kristen Lovely vs Kendra Tupper / Nancy Stern7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jacqueline Wierzba
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
3.27
Kellyn Goeken
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Courtney Eccles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Lauren Pinaroc
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.91
Terri Whitehair
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Nicole Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.76
Shelby Treloar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Kasey Benedict
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Lesley Kuhl
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kristen Lovely
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Eccles + Kellyn Goeken5261% games+12.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Wierzba + Courtney Eccles4160% games+3.4% vs expected
Shelby Treloar + Lesley Kuhl3265% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Kuhl + Kellyn Goeken404 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Wierzba + Nicole Stevens314 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Treloar + Terri Whitehair123 matchesnot enough data
Terri Whitehair + Courtney Eccles213 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Stevens + Kasey Benedict123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jacqueline Wierzba
44W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3
Kellyn Goeken
75W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
3
Courtney Eccles
39W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Lauren Pinaroc
16W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Terri Whitehair
58W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Nicole Stevens
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Shelby Treloar
31W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Kasey Benedict
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Lesley Kuhl
27W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kristen Lovely
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.