Teams

MEA NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-26vs CVTA NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesLauren Noyes / Mandy Sladden vs Maggie Brubaker / Jennifer Dingman3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Wu / Brendan Ash vs Holly Sprenkle / Lori Bird6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJulie Lockwood vs Jacqueline Rosains6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Obert / Kristen Royer vs Louise Fowler / Carole Brandt6-0, 6-2
2025-05-19vs BRMST REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesMandy Sladden / Julie Lockwood vs Kirsty Lockhart / Colleen Estrada6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Stiles vs Alden Perkins4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Ross / Brendan Ash vs Melissa Rawsky / Karen Gallo1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Jennifer Cooper1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Royer / Susan Wu vs Tammie Donohoe / Lisa Shaver6-1, 6-1
2025-05-12vs NJ REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristen Stiles / Mandy Sladden vs Courtney Eccles / Jacqueline Wierzba3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShannon Ross vs Lauren Pinaroc2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Noyes / Susan Wu vs Shelby Treloar / Terri Whitehair4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMary Sznewajs vs Nicole Stevens6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrendan Ash / Charity Sevian vs Kasey Benedict / Kellyn Goeken4-6, 2-6
2025-04-28vs RCC REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesMary Sznewajs / Kristen Royer vs Lindsey Little / Lauren Richards4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Jaime Grantham6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMandy Sladden / Lauren Noyes vs Rania Hamzeh / Christina Kirkpatrick6-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJulie Lockwood vs Amabel Akwa-Asare4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Ross / Brendan Ash vs Felicia Fry / Katie Dittmer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-21vs BCC ORANGEWon 50
W#1 DoublesShannon Ross / Kristen Royer vs Emma Anselmi / Marissa Fahrbach6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristen Stiles vs Kirsty Jahn6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Noyes / Mary Sznewajs vs Cyndy McClung / Devon Winkles6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Jessica Bishop6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCharity Sevian / Kim Obert vs Jane McKean / Neylu Longoria6-3, 6-3
2025-04-14vs TTA REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesMandy Sladden / Mary Sznewajs vs Alecia Phillips / Debby Melvin6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Lockwood vs Nicole Pazol6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrendan Ash / Charity Sevian vs Grace Whitmer / Michelle Templeton4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Stiles vs Mindy Gasser1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim Obert / Susan Wu vs Linda Hendrix / Nicole Palaschak6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Mary Sznewajs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Kristen Royer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Lauren Noyes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Mandy Sladden
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Shannon Ross
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Kristen Stiles
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Julie Lockwood
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.68
Charity Sevian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Melissa Azer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.58
Brendan Ash
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kim Obert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Noyes + Mary Sznewajs5076% games+10.5% vs expected
Kristen Stiles + Mandy Sladden5256% games+6.5% vs expected
Charity Sevian + Brendan Ash3644% games+0.6% vs expected
Lauren Noyes + Mandy Sladden3447% games−6.3% vs expected
Brendan Ash + Shannon Ross2341% gamesnot enough data
Julie Lockwood + Mary Sznewajs224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Noyes + Kristen Stiles224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Sznewajs + Kristen Stiles314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Sznewajs
59W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Kristen Royer
61W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lauren Noyes
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Mandy Sladden
23W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Shannon Ross
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Kristen Stiles
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Julie Lockwood
13W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Charity Sevian
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Melissa Azer
25W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Brendan Ash
33W–54L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Kim Obert
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.