Teams

DC Tennis Club

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-26vs Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 SinglesAngela Sharma vs Adriana Campos6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJocelyn McDaniel vs Erica Chicola6-4, 2-0
2023-08-19vs Piney RunLost 01
L#2 SinglesJocelyn McDaniel vs Amber Harrelson3-6, 0-6
2023-08-12vs Court JestersLost 01
L#1 SinglesAngela Sharma vs Mikaela Seligman4-6, 5-4
2023-08-05vs Serve AcesWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelly Kennedy vs Adriana Campos6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Wine vs Paige Mason4-6, 2-4
W#3 SinglesMarisol Bello vs Erica Chicola7-6
2023-07-29vs Piney RunLost 01
L#1 SinglesAngela Sharma vs Pilar Alvarez Jerez7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2023-07-22vs Court JestersWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelly Kennedy vs Bhavna Patel6-4, 2-1
L#2 SinglesMarisol Bello vs Kathleen van Dusen3-6, 3-5
W#3 SinglesAngela Sharma vs Shanna Denbow6-1, 4-4
2023-07-22vs Court JestersSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJocelyn McDaniel vs Margot Susca6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAndrea Brown-White vs Azalea Candelaria2-6, 0-1
2023-07-16Won 20
W#1 SinglesAndrea Brown-White vs Jessica Knowles6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Wine vs Adriana Campos6-0, 6-0
2023-07-15vs Piney RunLost 03
L#1 SinglesMarisol Bello vs Penelope Wilson6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJennifer Wine vs Pilar Alvarez Jerez3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAndrea Brown-White vs Amber Harrelson2-6, 1-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kelly Kennedy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Angela Sharma
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.81
Natalie Walker
published
2.78
Nadia Asancheyev
published
2.61
Jocelyn McDaniel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Jennifer Wine
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Andrea Brown-White
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Marisol Bello
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Kennedy
71W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
Natalie Walker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
Nadia Asancheyev
29W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Jocelyn McDaniel
49W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.61
Jennifer Wine
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Andrea Brown-White
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marisol Bello
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.