Teams

Serve Aces

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-26vs DC Tennis ClubLost 02
L#1 SinglesAdriana Campos vs Angela Sharma0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesErica Chicola vs Jocelyn McDaniel4-6, 0-2
2023-08-19vs Court JestersLost 12
W#1 SinglesPaige Mason vs Kathleen van Dusen6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesErica Chicola vs Margot Susca0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAmy Marazita vs Bhavna Patel3-6, 0-6
2023-08-12vs Piney RunLost 01
L#2 SinglesAmy Marazita vs Amber Harrelson0-6, 1-6
2023-08-05vs DC Tennis ClubLost 12
L#1 SinglesAdriana Campos vs Kelly Kennedy0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPaige Mason vs Jennifer Wine6-4, 4-2
L#3 SinglesErica Chicola vs Marisol Bello6-7
2023-07-29vs Court JestersLost 01
L#2 SinglesCaitlyn Blizzard vs Azalea Candelaria3-6, 1-2
2023-07-22vs Piney RunLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Mattern vs Penelope Wilson0-6, 0-6
2023-07-16vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#2 SinglesAdriana Campos vs Jennifer Wine0-6, 0-6
2023-07-15vs Court JestersLost 12
L#1 SinglesErica Chicola vs Lourdes Sanchez0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPaige Mason vs Shanna Denbow3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCaitlyn Blizzard vs Kathleen van Dusen1-6, 0-6
2023-07-08vs Piney RunLost 01
L#1 SinglesAdriana Campos vs Pilar Alvarez Jerez0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serve Aces1872040247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Paige Mason
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Adriana Campos
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Amy Marazita
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Caitlyn Blizzard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
1.99
Erica Chicola
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Kristen Mattern
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Mason
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Adriana Campos
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Amy Marazita
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Caitlyn Blizzard
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Erica Chicola
3W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Kristen Mattern
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.