Teams

OC LNRC - Kristie

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#2 DoublesLalida Anderson / Lauren Steinbruner vs Patty Rydelski / Diane Miller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-16vs OC Newport Beach TC - Katya/KimmyWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Steinbruner / Lalida Anderson vs Pam Reyna / Kim Mishow6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jaclyn Nisenson
published
3.58
Cassie Hadfield
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.44
Crystal Holbrook
published 3.5
3.44
Tracy Qin
published
3.39
Lalida Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Dayna Marinos
published 3.5
3.38
Maureen Dominguez
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Somer Holstein
published
3.27
Teresa Zack
published
3.26
Lauren Steinbruner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Dani Aloma
published 3.5
3.20
3.03
Christine Andriola
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.91
Joan Levis
published
Sara Tinnelly
published
Susan Hoffnagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Dominguez + Cassie Hadfield12261% games+5.9% vs expected
Somer Holstein + Crystal Holbrook8264% games+3.0% vs expected
Lalida Anderson + Maureen Dominguez421159% games−0.7% vs expected
Dani Aloma + Teresa Zack213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaclyn Nisenson
43W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Cassie Hadfield
62W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Crystal Holbrook
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tracy Qin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Lalida Anderson
86W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Dayna Marinos
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Maureen Dominguez
122W–50L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Somer Holstein
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Teresa Zack
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Lauren Steinbruner
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Dani Aloma
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Lynn Allison
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristie Carsten-Hensley
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christine Andriola
28W–83L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Joan Levis
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Sara Tinnelly
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Hoffnagle
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.