Teams

YTC: T's Misfits

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.0 Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoan Lavin / Nancy Aranow vs Lisa Caldwell / Katie Finnegan6-3, 7-6
2026-03-13vs NRRC: NetChicks and ChillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria DelGiudice / Dawn Jackson vs Marina Bregman / Lindsay Preftakes6-0, 6-4
2026-03-09vs Greenwich Racquet Club: RedLost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn Jackson / Karen Arnett vs Hala Si-Ahmed / Andrea Dufresne6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-04vs SHI: Flint Park Village PeopleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Arnett / Deborah Weinstein vs Stephanie Secchia / Sarah Dunn0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Jackson / Kathleen Starr vs Ann Goode / Joanna Liebman6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRima Marcel / Carol Tse vs Monika Roth / Michelle Cohn6-4, 6-2
2026-01-30vs Westchester Country ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeana Rahman / Maria DelGiudice vs Kerry Soliman / Karina Verni6-2, 6-0
2026-01-12vs Sportime LI: LightningWon 21
L#1 DoublesDawn Jackson / Christina Vitale vs Laurie Medvinsky / Sara Foster6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRima Marcel / Carol Tse vs Gwynn Hurshman / Amy Nadasdi6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeana Rahman / Karen Arnett vs Frances Magrino / Linying Liu7-5, 6-1
2026-01-09vs OGTA: OGTAgonalsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeana Rahman / Carol Tse vs Bonnie Wreschner / Lauren Mattson5-7, 2-5
W#3 DoublesRima Marcel / Dawn Jackson vs Jennifer Pizzitola / Kimberly Steinberg6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Deanna Santoro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Maria DelGiudice
published
2.91
Kathleen Starr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Carol Tse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Rima Marcel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Dawn Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Deborah Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Nancy Aranow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Karen Arnett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Leana Rahman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Joan Lavin
published
Kendra Galletta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Arnett + Rima Marcel3353% games+15.1% vs expected
Carol Tse + Karen Arnett3347% games+6.8% vs expected
Dawn Jackson + Leana Rahman10951% games+1.0% vs expected
Karen Arnett + Kathleen Starr0527% games−13.1% vs expected
Deborah Weinstein + Joan Lavin3347% gamesnot enough data
Leana Rahman + Karen Arnett314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Starr + Rima Marcel224 matchesnot enough data
Leana Rahman + Deborah Weinstein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Santoro
69W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Maria DelGiudice
26W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
3
Kathleen Starr
32W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Carol Tse
46W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Rima Marcel
17W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Dawn Jackson
91W–105L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Deborah Weinstein
29W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Nancy Aranow
66W–138L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Karen Arnett
28W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Leana Rahman
95W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Joan Lavin
11W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kendra Galletta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.