Teams

Stephens/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-16vs Korenberg/Lawrence/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Hill / Amelia Stephens vs Dawn Cole / Christina Beattie4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Madison Fair vs Courtney Fraser-Mason / Myrvete Korenberg1-6, 5-7
2025-03-12vs Steed/Thompson/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Labetti / Laurel Dortch vs Monica Kenny / Allie Steed6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmelia Stephens / Natalie Geng vs Lele Thompson / Carey Burch6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKatie Laughinghouse vs Ashley Kennedy2-6, 3-6
2025-03-05vs Givens/Mouser/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Labetti / Madison Fair vs Rebecca Bourlakas / Janelle VanHootegem4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaret Caamano / Katie Laughinghouse vs Patricia Frawley / Stephanie Protz2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Stephanie Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Rebekah Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jennifer Gilkey
published
2.94
Katie Laughinghouse
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Natalie Geng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Elisa Hill
published
2.86
Monica Kenny
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Amelia Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Jill Labetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Cynthia Madson
published 3
2.74
Cara Adams
published 3
2.63
Anne Ammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Stephens + Stephanie Hill3353% games+9.8% vs expected
Anne Ammons + Monica Kenny10262% games+9.2% vs expected
Cynthia Madson + Elisa Hill3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hill
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rebekah Carroll
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jennifer Gilkey
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Katie Laughinghouse
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Natalie Geng
25W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Monica Kenny
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Amelia Stephens
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Jill Labetti
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cynthia Madson
23W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cara Adams
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Anne Ammons
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.