Teams

Duval/Miller

2026 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women ESL Fall · 9.0 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-06vs Boone Park CieslaWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Lancaster / Nancy Powell vs Tanya Reimschissel / Maryse Hotchkiss7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Miller / Marie Waller vs Grace Costello / Ellen Dyal6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Brulte / Rebecca Sejeck vs Heaju Lee / Loretta Zubero6-1, 6-2
2025-11-22vs Boone Park CieslaWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Brulte / Sue Levin vs Grace Costello / Tanya Reimschissel7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Saig / Cecilia Collins vs Maryse Hotchkiss / Loretta Zubero6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Miller / Marie Waller vs Helen Ciesla / Deborah Schaefer7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-15vs Boone Park CieslaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Miller / Sue Levin vs Loretta Zubero / Maryse Hotchkiss6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCecilia Collins / Kristen Lancaster vs Helen Ciesla / Deborah Schaefer4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Miller / Cindy Vermut vs Ellen Dyal / Geraldine Sy6-4, 6-1
2025-11-08vs Boone Park CieslaWon 30
W#1 DoublesCecilia Collins / Jill Saig vs Grace Costello / Maryse Hotchkiss7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Vermut / Suzanne Brulte vs Tanya Reimschissel / Janet Wells6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristen Lancaster / Nancy Powell vs Helen Ciesla / Ellen Dyal6-2, 6-1
2025-11-01vs Boone Park CieslaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Saig / Cecilia Collins vs Teresa Linck / Karin Fletcher6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Powell / Kristen Lancaster vs Helen Ciesla / Deborah Schaefer7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaula Miller / Marylou Dankelman vs Maryse Hotchkiss / Geraldine Sy5-7, 2-6
2025-10-25vs Boone Park CieslaLost 12
L#1 DoublesCecilia Collins / Suzanne Brulte vs Grace Costello / Heaju Lee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Saig / Kimberly McCarthy vs Teresa Linck / Karin Fletcher6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Vermut / Rebecca Sejeck vs Geraldine Sy / Loretta Zubero2-6, 3-6
2025-10-18vs Boone Park CieslaWon 20
W#1 DoublesCecilia Collins / Jill Saig vs Helen Ciesla / Karin Fletcher6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Sejeck / Cindy Vermut vs Grace Costello / Tanya Reimschissel6-4, 6-0
2025-09-27vs Boone Park CieslaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Miller / Marie Waller vs Maryse Hotchkiss / Loretta Zubero1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarylou Dankelman / Paula Miller vs Deborah Schaefer / Helen Ciesla2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJill Saig / Kimberly McCarthy vs Janet Wells / Grace Costello6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Cecilia Collins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Jill Saig
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.32
Nancy Powell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Cindy Vermut
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Kimberly McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Sue Levin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Rebecca Sejeck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Suzanne Brulte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Kristen Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marie Waller
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marylou Dankelman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Saig + Cecilia Collins404 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Powell + Kristen Lancaster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cecilia Collins
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
Jill Saig
35W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Nancy Powell
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Cindy Vermut
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Kimberly McCarthy
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
Sue Levin
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Rebecca Sejeck
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
Suzanne Brulte
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
Kristen Lancaster
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
Marie Waller
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marylou Dankelman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.