Teams

Boone Park Ciesla

2026 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women ESL Fall · 9.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-06vs Duval/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesTanya Reimschissel / Maryse Hotchkiss vs Kristen Lancaster / Nancy Powell5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Costello / Ellen Dyal vs Lisa Miller / Marie Waller3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHeaju Lee / Loretta Zubero vs Suzanne Brulte / Rebecca Sejeck1-6, 2-6
2025-11-22vs Duval/MillerLost 12
W#1 DoublesGrace Costello / Tanya Reimschissel vs Suzanne Brulte / Sue Levin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaryse Hotchkiss / Loretta Zubero vs Jill Saig / Cecilia Collins7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHelen Ciesla / Deborah Schaefer vs Lisa Miller / Marie Waller5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-15vs Duval/MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLoretta Zubero / Maryse Hotchkiss vs Lisa Miller / Sue Levin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHelen Ciesla / Deborah Schaefer vs Cecilia Collins / Kristen Lancaster6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Dyal / Geraldine Sy vs Paula Miller / Cindy Vermut4-6, 1-6
2025-11-08vs Duval/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Costello / Maryse Hotchkiss vs Cecilia Collins / Jill Saig5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Reimschissel / Janet Wells vs Cindy Vermut / Suzanne Brulte3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Ciesla / Ellen Dyal vs Kristen Lancaster / Nancy Powell2-6, 1-6
2025-11-01vs Duval/MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Linck / Karin Fletcher vs Jill Saig / Cecilia Collins3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Ciesla / Deborah Schaefer vs Nancy Powell / Kristen Lancaster6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMaryse Hotchkiss / Geraldine Sy vs Paula Miller / Marylou Dankelman7-5, 6-2
2025-10-25vs Duval/MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrace Costello / Heaju Lee vs Cecilia Collins / Suzanne Brulte3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Linck / Karin Fletcher vs Jill Saig / Kimberly McCarthy3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGeraldine Sy / Loretta Zubero vs Cindy Vermut / Rebecca Sejeck6-2, 6-3
2025-10-18vs Duval/MillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesHelen Ciesla / Karin Fletcher vs Cecilia Collins / Jill Saig2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Costello / Tanya Reimschissel vs Rebecca Sejeck / Cindy Vermut4-6, 0-6
2025-09-27vs Duval/MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryse Hotchkiss / Loretta Zubero vs Lisa Miller / Marie Waller6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeborah Schaefer / Helen Ciesla vs Marylou Dankelman / Paula Miller6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJanet Wells / Grace Costello vs Jill Saig / Kimberly McCarthy4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Deborah Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Geraldine Sy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Tanya Reimschissel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Maryse Hotchkiss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.94
Helen Ciesla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Ellen Dyal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Grace Costello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heaju Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Wells
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karin Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Loretta Zubero
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Teresa Linck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Linck + Ellen Dyal8264% gamesnot enough data
Karin Fletcher + Teresa Linck5355% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Schaefer + Helen Ciesla224 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Reimschissel + Maryse Hotchkiss123 matchesnot enough data
Loretta Zubero + Maryse Hotchkiss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Schaefer
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Geraldine Sy
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Tanya Reimschissel
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
4.04
Maryse Hotchkiss
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
Helen Ciesla
3W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
4.5
Ellen Dyal
69W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.77
Grace Costello
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Heaju Lee
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Wells
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karin Fletcher
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Loretta Zubero
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Linck
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.