Teams

TGreen (Chestnut Square) Long Shots

2023 Summer Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 8.5 Women; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-28Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Danna Jean Pompeo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-23Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Danna Jean Pompeo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-18Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesDanna Jean Pompeo / Heather Hiteshew vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 Female DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Danna Jean Pompeo vs Brittany Clyne / Linda Bleakney6-2, 6-1
2023-07-05vs LStewart (CSRC)Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesTricia Green / Liz Misenheimer vs Ivy Tedrick / Kim Bowman6-1, 6-4
W#1 Female DoublesTricia Green / Heather Hiteshew vs Tricia Williams / Suzy Sandbo6-0, 6-1
2023-06-11vs KKopley (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Tricia Green vs Kacey Kopley / Leezah Pratt6-0, 6-0
W#1 Female DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Danna Jean Pompeo vs Cheri King / Judith Skelton6-2, 6-0
2023-06-02vs HHope (Firethorne)Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Heather Hiteshew vs Roxanne Kastein / Tara Wilson7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Heather Hiteshew
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
3.81
Liz Misenheimer
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
Tricia Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Green + Heather Hiteshew6751% games−4.0% vs expected
Danna Jean Pompeo + Heather Hiteshew3254% games−7.6% vs expected
Liz Misenheimer + Danna Jean Pompeo134 matchesnot enough data
Danna Jean Pompeo + Tricia Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Hiteshew
115W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Danna Jean Pompeo
71W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Liz Misenheimer
117W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
Tricia Green
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.