Teams

Heat Strokes

2022 FALL DAYTIME DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-09-29vs HillcrestSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Inghram / Virginia Watterson vs Hillary Lilya / Tina Michael6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAndrea Reynolds / Cari Massie vs Shawna Ianson / Leslie Michael6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Watterson / Michele Inghram vs Katheryn Burriesci / Christine Elwer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-22vs Ladytennisty DTLost 01
L#3 DoublesVirginia Watterson / Cari Massie vs Yuzhu Zheng / Lovely Devlin1-6, 6-7
2022-09-20vs Wilson WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKit Herndon / Dana Rusin vs Jan Treadway / Michelle Meyers1-6, 0-6
2022-09-15vs ETC SwingersLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrea Reynolds / Virginia Watterson vs Jennifer Colson / Lisa Stimpson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCari Massie / Karie Pappani vs Tina Taylor / Beth Calvo2-6, 0-6
2022-09-13vs HillcrestLost 01
L#2 DoublesKit Herndon / Cari Massie vs Maria Heffner / Hillary Lilya3-6, 0-6
2022-09-08vs Eagle GalsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Reynolds / Virginia Watterson vs Heather Rice / Colette van de Graaff6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLacey Cline / Cari Massie vs Julienne Ferguson / Nancy Mallory0-6, 3-6
2022-09-06vs Ladytennisty DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesVirginia Watterson / Karie Pappani vs Yuzhu Zheng / Kelly Wedeven3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana Rusin / Cari Massie vs Mardianne Howell / Jill Belau6-7, 2-6
2022-09-01vs Wilson WomenLost 01
L#3 DoublesCari Massie / Dana Rusin vs Kelly Raad / Kimberlee Megale1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC Swingers82201022220
2Eagle Gals73201023223
3Ladytennisty DT64191127255
4Wilson Women64161431235
5Hillcrest2882248304
6Heat Strokes01042655347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Michele Inghram
published 3.5
Cari Massie
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Jennifer Gleason
published 3.5
3.23
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.20
Karie Pappani
published 3.5
3.18
Dana Rusin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Kit Herndon
published 3
2.74
Katherine Bruno
published 3
Virginia Watterson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Rusin + Michele Inghram82837% games−2.3% vs expected
Karie Pappani + Jennifer Gleason1447% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Reynolds + Virginia Watterson224 matchesnot enough data
Michele Inghram + Virginia Watterson404 matchesnot enough data
Dana Rusin + Cari Massie033 matchesnot enough data
Karie Pappani + Michele Inghram303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michele Inghram
147W–119L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cari Massie
46W–96L career · type S · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Gleason
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Karie Pappani
153W–139L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dana Rusin
88W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Kit Herndon
44W–66L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Katherine Bruno
43W–73L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Virginia Watterson
12W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.