Teams

8.0 Team

2026 USTA Adult 55&Over League - Abilene · 8.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-04vs Evans TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesRose Bristow / Carolyn Landess vs Susan Bowles / Lana Bland4-8
L#2 DoublesKaren Hart / Teresa Everett vs Laura Evans / Sherry Stewart5-8
L#3 DoublesValerie Giles / Rhonda Hatchett vs Kelly Pointer / Linda Ueckert7-9
2026-04-04vs Evans TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Everett / Karen Hart vs Melissa Patterson / Laura Evans3-8
L#2 DoublesRhonda Hatchett / Marie Welsh vs LeAnn Doby / Judy Voelter4-8
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Landess / Rose Bristow vs Ellen Massey / Lana Bland4-8
2026-04-03vs Evans TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Hart / Teresa Everett vs Laura Evans / Sherry Stewart1-8
L#2 DoublesValerie Giles / Rhonda Hatchett vs Linda Ueckert / Kelly Pointer4-8
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Landess / Rose Bristow vs Susan Bowles / Lana Bland3-8
2026-04-03vs Evans TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Welsh / Rhonda Hatchett vs LeAnn Doby / Judy Voelter3-8
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Landess / Rose Bristow vs Lana Bland / Ellen Massey4-8
L#3 DoublesTeresa Everett / Karen Hart vs Laura Evans / Melissa Patterson3-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Evans Team40120045
28.0 Team040121297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Rose Bristow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Rhonda Hatchett
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.38
Carolyn Landess
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Marie Welsh
published
Teresa Everett
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Giles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Landess + Rose Bristow044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rose Bristow
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Rhonda Hatchett
6W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Carolyn Landess
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Marie Welsh
21W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Everett
0W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Giles
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.