Teams

Evans Team

2026 USTA Adult 55&Over League - Abilene · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-04vs 8.0 TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Bowles / Lana Bland vs Rose Bristow / Carolyn Landess8-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Evans / Sherry Stewart vs Karen Hart / Teresa Everett8-5
W#3 DoublesKelly Pointer / Linda Ueckert vs Valerie Giles / Rhonda Hatchett9-7
2026-04-04vs 8.0 TeamWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeAnn Doby / Judy Voelter vs Rhonda Hatchett / Marie Welsh8-4
W#3 DoublesEllen Massey / Lana Bland vs Carolyn Landess / Rose Bristow8-4
2026-04-03vs 8.0 TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Evans / Sherry Stewart vs Karen Hart / Teresa Everett8-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Ueckert / Kelly Pointer vs Valerie Giles / Rhonda Hatchett8-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Bowles / Lana Bland vs Carolyn Landess / Rose Bristow8-3
2026-04-03vs 8.0 TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeAnn Doby / Judy Voelter vs Marie Welsh / Rhonda Hatchett8-3
W#2 DoublesLana Bland / Ellen Massey vs Carolyn Landess / Rose Bristow8-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Evans Team40120045
28.0 Team040121297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
LeAnn Doby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Kelly Pointer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Lana Bland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Susan Bowles
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
Sherry Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Linda Ueckert
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Ellen Massey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Judy Voelter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Pointer + Linda Ueckert2438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LeAnn Doby
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kelly Pointer
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Lana Bland
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Susan Bowles
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Sherry Stewart
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Linda Ueckert
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Ellen Massey
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Judy Voelter
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.