Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-15vs GOLDEN GATEWY 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJing Gu / Gail Fong vs Esther Kim / Leilani Latimer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGail Fong / Corrine Fabie vs Sarita Turley / Mona Lee6-4, 6-0
2025-05-13vs GOLDMAN TC 18AW3.5CLost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Fong / Twinee Madan vs Timmie Haskins / Sara Singerman0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-06vs SILVER CREEK 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGail Fong / Katherine Sandell vs Nitika Korla / Laura Viarengo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-29vs STRAWBERRY 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherri Glenn / Gail Fong vs Andrea Barrett / Amy Alvarado7-6, 6-3
2025-04-28vs ALMADEN SR 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Clifford / Gail Fong vs Julie Boncher / Laurie Christian-Neff6-7, 3-6
2025-04-24vs YMCA PRESIDIO 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTonya Vincent / Gail Fong vs Elizabeth Lougee / Emily Kitts5-7, 1-6
2025-04-23vs LOS GATOS SR 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Fong / Twinee Madan vs Lauren Denevi / Mary Jo Lee3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Angela Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Twinee Madan
published
3.39
Marilena Gallotta
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Sherri Glenn
published
3.37
Haewon Kwon
published
3.34
Annika Kahn
published 3
3.34
Abi Kandasamy
published 3.5
3.33
Gail Fong
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Natalie Wong
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Marla Lindsay
published
3.27
Su-Mien Chong
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Tonya Vincent
published
3.25
Willow Nye
published
3.18
Meyla Ruwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Lilian Tom
published
3.15
Amy Clifford
published 3.5
3.14
Deborah Zeitschel
published 3.5
3.14
Monica Reid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Jing Gu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Lisa Cortopassi
published
2.74
Jalpa Patel
published
Jeremie Montero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Clifford + Deborah Zeitschel5649% games+1.7% vs expected
Sherri Glenn + Tonya Vincent5451% games+1.4% vs expected
Marla Lindsay + Amy Clifford303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Lam
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Twinee Madan
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Marilena Gallotta
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sherri Glenn
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Haewon Kwon
44W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3
Annika Kahn
16W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
3.5
Abi Kandasamy
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Natalie Wong
19W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Marla Lindsay
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Su-Mien Chong
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Tonya Vincent
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Willow Nye
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Meyla Ruwin
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Lilian Tom
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Amy Clifford
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Zeitschel
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Monica Reid
3W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Jing Gu
14W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lisa Cortopassi
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jalpa Patel
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Jeremie Montero
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.