Teams

MEA PURPLE

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-07vs CVTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Royer / Paula King vs Deborah Puro / Lorrie Johnson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Bohan / Mimi Goodman vs Jodi Ansell / Julia Garza7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJanice Jeffryes / Marty Kinsley vs Susan Wong-Gibbons / Susan MacLeod2-6, 6-6
2025-07-31vs CVTA GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesKristen Royer / Mimi Goodman vs Jodi Ansell / Susan Wong-Gibbons6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanice Jeffryes / Lisa Varga vs Lorrie Johnson / Deborah Puro3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMarty Kinsley / Diane Bohan vs Julia Garza / Liz Griffin3-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs CVTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Deborah Puro / Lorrie Johnson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbe Welsh / Kristen Royer vs Jodi Ansell / Liz Griffin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarty Kinsley / Diane Bohan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-17vs CVTA GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesMimi Goodman / Paula King vs Susan Wong-Gibbons / Deborah Puro4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPam Decker / Beth Saperstein vs Jodi Ansell / Liz Griffin6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Jeffryes / Debbe Welsh vs Lorrie Johnson / Susan MacLeod6-0, 6-1
2025-07-10vs CVTA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Bohan / Debbe Welsh vs Jodi Ansell / Deborah Puro6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanice Jeffryes / Paula King vs Julia Garza / Liz Griffin2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Varga / Marty Kinsley vs Susan MacLeod / Susan Wong-Gibbons6-4, 6-4
2025-07-03vs CVTA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula King / Mimi Goodman vs Deborah Puro / Susan Wong-Gibbons6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Saperstein / Pam Decker vs Julia Garza / Liz Griffin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Sanders / Marty Kinsley vs Jodi Ansell / Susan MacLeod1-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs CVTA GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesMimi Goodman / Paula King vs Deborah Puro / Jodi Ansell4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDebbe Welsh / Diane Bohan vs Susan Wong-Gibbons / Julia Garza7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Varga / Marty Kinsley vs Susan MacLeod / Lorrie Johnson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CACM PURPLE5114412140
2PCC PINK5112614147
3MEA PURPLE5212921186
4LTC-D YELLOW4210821173
5BM YELLOW339920157
6CK PURPLE2481022165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Kristen Royer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Debbe Welsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Beth Saperstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Diane Bohan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Carolyn Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Mimi Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Lisa Varga
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Marty Kinsley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janice Jeffryes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Decker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paula King
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula King + Kristen Royer3249% gamesnot enough data
Paula King + Mimi Goodman044 matchesnot enough data
Beth Saperstein + Pam Decker404 matchesnot enough data
Paula King + Carolyn Sanders213 matchesnot enough data
Mimi Goodman + Kristen Royer303 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Royer + Marty Kinsley033 matchesnot enough data
Marty Kinsley + Lisa Varga303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kristen Royer
61W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Debbe Welsh
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Beth Saperstein
35W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Diane Bohan
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carolyn Sanders
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Mimi Goodman
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Lisa Varga
25W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Marty Kinsley
12W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Janice Jeffryes
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Decker
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula King
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.