Teams

PORCELLI/SIMMONS

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-26vs Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesMary Simmons / Wen Li vs Jenna Butler / Jenna Stachowiak1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKara Nelson / Lauren Rasar vs Kristine Janik / Jennifer Parrotte6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Foster / Stephanie Stevens vs Anna Taylor / Kate Dawson6-3, 6-2
2026-08-22vs SlocumbWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Hanly / Kara Nelson vs Diane Gentry / Mary Kenworthy7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCynthia Zu / Megan Atterbury vs Vickie Kosh / Martha Broadbent6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristin Porcelli / Susan Schoolfield vs Jennifer Adams / Amanda Clardy5-7, 1-6
2026-08-17vs deOlivaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Porcelli / Mary Simmons vs Amy Kullberg / Heather Weddle6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Atterbury / Alexis Niggebrugge Gunn vs Pati DeOliva / Deedee Greene3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Rasar / Kara Nelson vs Logan Sullivan / Katie Ferree6-1, 7-5
2026-08-12vs Cooper/Lopatka 7.5 18+ ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Porcelli / Anna Porcelli vs Denise Lopatka / Thornton Cornette4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wescott / Molly Hanly vs Kelly Cooper / Kimberly Batten7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWen Li / Susan Schoolfield vs Caroline Blanton / Hope Sloan6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Anna Porcelli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Lauren Rasar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Stephanie Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Megan Atterbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Jennifer Wescott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Cynthia Zu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Wen Li
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Kara Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Kristin Porcelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Alexis Niggebrugge Gunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Evelyn Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Susan Schoolfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Molly Hanly
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Stevens + Megan Atterbury6456% games+8.6% vs expected
Kristin Porcelli + Alexis Niggebrugge Gunn224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Porcelli
27W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.09
Lauren Rasar
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Stephanie Stevens
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Megan Atterbury
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Jennifer Wescott
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Cynthia Zu
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Wen Li
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.35
Kara Nelson
30W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Kristin Porcelli
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alexis Niggebrugge Gunn
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Evelyn Foster
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Susan Schoolfield
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Molly Hanly
17W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.