Teams

Team 4 Vitalie Stirbu 8.5M

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 8.5M

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Team 3 Raja Kanchi 8.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesVignan Thumu / Andrew Wan vs Race Collins / Jeff Kennedy6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Lundon / Kingsley Kuo vs Krystyan Lazarin / Trae Watlington6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRama Goud / Vivek Jadhav vs Craig Markley / Ranganath Kanchi6-2, 6-3
2026-08-22vs Team 1 Sumesh Chopra 8.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesDan Cordales / Kingsley Kuo vs Justin Bohn / Irfan Zobayed6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wan / Guilherme Portela vs Michael Mabe / Sergei Tyryshkin6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVivek Jadhav / Rama Goud vs Sumesh Chopra / Samuel Hussein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-22vs Team 2 Calvin McDonald 8.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Cordales / Kingsley Kuo vs Jonathan Cobb / Gary Sinclair3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVitalie Stirbu / Guilherme Portela vs Michael Frajkor / Jason Turck2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVignan Thumu / Andrew Wan vs William Fox / Calvin McDonald6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 4 Vitalie Stirbu 8.5M000000
2Team 1 Sumesh Chopra 8.5M000000
3Team 2 Calvin McDonald 8.5M000000
4Team 3 Raja Kanchi 8.5M000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Rama Goud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Kyle Lundon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Dan Cordales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Andrew Wan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Guilherme Portela
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kingsley Kuo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vignan Thumu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Vitalie Stirbu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vivek Jadhav
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vitalie Stirbu + Kyle Lundon4259% gamesnot enough data
Kingsley Kuo + Dan Cordales123 matchesnot enough data
Dan Cordales + Vitalie Stirbu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rama Goud
24W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Kyle Lundon
107W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Dan Cordales
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Andrew Wan
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Guilherme Portela
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Kingsley Kuo
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vignan Thumu
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vitalie Stirbu
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vivek Jadhav
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.