Teams

Team 1 Sumesh Chopra 8.5M

2026 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · 8.5M

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Team 2 Calvin McDonald 8.5MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIrfan Zobayed / Justin Bohn vs Calvin McDonald / Vincent Nguyen6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Mabe / Samuel Hussein vs Michael Frajkor / Gary Sinclair0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-22vs Team 4 Vitalie Stirbu 8.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Bohn / Irfan Zobayed vs Dan Cordales / Kingsley Kuo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Mabe / Sergei Tyryshkin vs Andrew Wan / Guilherme Portela4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSumesh Chopra / Samuel Hussein vs Vivek Jadhav / Rama Goud6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-22vs Team 3 Raja Kanchi 8.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJustin Bohn / Irfan Zobayed vs Race Collins / Trae Watlington6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Mabe / Sergei Tyryshkin vs Scott Anders / Krystyan Lazarin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEthan Kittredge / Mason Utley vs Kyle Henry / Ranganath Kanchi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.5M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 4 Vitalie Stirbu 8.5M000000
2Team 1 Sumesh Chopra 8.5M000000
3Team 2 Calvin McDonald 8.5M000000
4Team 3 Raja Kanchi 8.5M000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Michael Mabe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Caden Lott
published 4.5
4.01
Sergei Tyryshkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Sumesh Chopra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.65
Samuel Hussein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ethan Kittredge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Irfan Zobayed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Bohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mason Utley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wah Jeung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caden Lott + Ethan Kittredge213 matchesnot enough data
Irfan Zobayed + Justin Bohn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Mabe
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Caden Lott
19W–6L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Sergei Tyryshkin
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Sumesh Chopra
90W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
Samuel Hussein
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Ethan Kittredge
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Irfan Zobayed
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Justin Bohn
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mason Utley
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Wah Jeung
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.