Teams

2-HRemley-Eno-5.0

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women-Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-03vs 3-TTed-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Shapiro / Heather Remley vs Stacie Luders / Jennifer Hiller6-4, 6-2
2022-04-26vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Leslie Boesch vs Elizabeth Speicher / Rachel Davis6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaryBeth Jackson vs Jessica Mauney6-7, 1-6
2022-04-05vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Lorraine Bowen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-22vs 3-TTed-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Griffin / Heather Remley vs MacY Fisher / Stacie Luders2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Logan Shapiro vs Michelle Ahlquist / Lindsey Moore6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-15vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Remley / Jennifer McEntee vs Elizabeth Speicher / Jessica Mauney4-6, 5-7
2022-03-01vs 3-TTed-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Heather Remley vs Lisa Spees / Tanita Tedamrongwanish7-5, 6-4
2022-02-22vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer McEntee - * / Leslie Boesch vs Emily Tinervin / Elizabeth Speicher5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.47
4.46
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.43
Leslie Boesch
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 5
4.23
Charlie Trinco
published 4.5
Logan Shapiro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Boesch + Heather Remley3455% games+7.6% vs expected
Heather Remley + Kelly Moler Glass5059% games+2.7% vs expected
Leslie Boesch + MaryBeth Jackson3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kelly Moler Glass
70W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
4.68
Mary-Katherine Martin
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
108W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Leslie Boesch
245W–102L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
5
Heather Remley
298W–155L career · 10 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
4.42
4.5
Charlie Trinco
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Logan Shapiro
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.