Teams

ACP.Tandradinata

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-21vs ACP.FranksLost 12
L#1 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Sarah Franks2-6
L#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Amy Hoots5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesEllen Libby vs Christine Gladman6-4, 6-3
2024-08-05vs TING.StarrittSplit 11
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Emily Starritt6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEllen Libby vs Karen Reynders6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-31vs CAS.KuzmaSplit 11
L#2 SinglesEllen Libby vs Maura Lever6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Amy Trail6-2, 6-4
2024-07-24vs TOC.FriddleWon 20
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Wendy Hanshew7-5
W#3 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Paula Bullock6-4, 6-1
2024-07-09vs CAS.KuzmaWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Cetola vs Deb Lanier6-3, 7-5
2024-06-12vs TOC.FriddleLost 02
L#1 SinglesEllen Libby vs Stephannie Messina0-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesAulia Tandradinata vs Paula Dwyer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-05vs ACP.FranksLost 03
L#1 SinglesMelissa Cetola vs Laurie Straube6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Amy Hoots4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLynelle Boorey vs Dana Cantrell0-6, 2-6
2024-05-29Won 10
W#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Laura Ross2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kathryn Stone
published
3.69
Melissa Cetola
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Yvette LeGrande
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Ellen Libby
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Aulia Tandradinata
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Lynelle Boorey
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Kathleen Murray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynelle Boorey + Aulia Tandradinata4255% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Libby + Kathryn Stone303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Stone
32W–24L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Melissa Cetola
114W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Yvette LeGrande
140W–139L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Ellen Libby
140W–97L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Aulia Tandradinata
283W–128L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Lynelle Boorey
97W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kathleen Murray
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.