Teams

ACP.Franks

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-21vs TING.StarrittLost 12
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Rebecca Reynolds3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Karen Reynders4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Laura Ross7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-21vs ACP.TandradinataSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Yvette LeGrande7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Ellen Libby4-6, 3-6
2024-08-13vs CAS.KuzmaWon 10
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Amy Trail6-0, 6-1
2024-07-31Split 11
W#1 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Laura Ross6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJennifer Ferralli vs Paige Jennings3-6, 0-6
2024-07-24vs CAS.KuzmaWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Deb Lanier6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Stayce Key7-5, 6-1
2024-06-05vs ACP.TandradinataWon 30
W#1 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Melissa Cetola4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Yvette LeGrande6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Lynelle Boorey6-0, 6-2
2024-05-22vs TOC.FriddleWon 10
W#3 SinglesJennifer Ferralli vs Jill Cardella6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Amy Hoots
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.54
Laurie Straube
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Dana Cantrell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Sarah Franks
published
3.37
Christine Gladman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Donna Spero
published
3.27
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
3.09
Jennifer Ferralli
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Sheza Healey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Franks + Laurie Straube4154% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Hoots
105W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
4.17
3.5
Laurie Straube
169W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Dana Cantrell
57W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Sarah Franks
52W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Christine Gladman
78W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Donna Spero
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Berna Tareen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Ferralli
23W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sheza Healey
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.