Teams

CROW CANYON CC 18AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Sonia Barnoff
published
3.70
Relura Horton
published
3.69
Heather Houston
published 4
3.51
Miriam DeQuadros
usually #2 Singles 23%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
3.39
Pia Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.36
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.31
Jill Pfeiffer
published
3.28
Emily Amott
published 3.5
3.16
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.88
Gayle Millington
published 3
2.79
Karen Schumann
published
Kari Mamizuka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Pfeiffer + Dana Kruger213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Kruger + Emily Amott033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Barnoff
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Relura Horton
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Heather Houston
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pia Moore
67W–40L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
Jill Pfeiffer
44W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Emily Amott
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Gayle Millington
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Karen Schumann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
Kari Mamizuka
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.