Teams

Nolan/Davis 3.0 Singles

2024 Singles League 18&over-NE · Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-11vs Sara GammillLost 03
L#1 SinglesSara Davis vs Lindsey Stevens4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Huckaby vs Elise Mcmasters2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBeth Nolan vs Rebekah Wiseman1-6, 0-6
2024-11-06vs Clinic Peeps 3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Huckaby vs Patti Carroll6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSara Davis vs Joy Whittle6-2, 6-2
2024-11-04vs McNutt/ Beck SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesSara Davis vs Hannah McCullough6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBeth Nolan vs Bonnie Mize0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Whitney Pegues-Beck3-6, 4-6
2024-11-03vs Sara GammillLost 03
L#1 SinglesSara Davis vs Hester Lowe2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesApril Gray vs Sara Gammill2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAnn Hazel vs Tabi Talley5-7, 3-6
2024-10-27vs McNutt/ Beck SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Huckaby vs Margaret Burleson Jarvis1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesApril Gray vs Bonnie Mize4-6, 1-6
2024-10-22vs Clinic Peeps 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSara Davis vs Sherry Vance6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAjah Sawyer vs Susie Miley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAnn Hazel vs Samantha Weatherford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
April Gray
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Ann Hazel
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Lauren Huckaby
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.56
Sara Davis
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Ajah Sawyer
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Beth Nolan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Huckaby + April Gray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
April Gray
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Ann Hazel
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Huckaby
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
Sara Davis
16W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Ajah Sawyer
19W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Beth Nolan
3W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.