Teams

Sara Gammill

2024 Singles League 18&over-NE · Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-20vs McNutt/ Beck SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSara Gammill vs Savannah Koon6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLacey Harden vs Elizabeth Gatlin2-6, 3-6
2024-11-20vs McNutt/ Beck SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesHester Lowe vs Margaret Burleson Jarvis6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKelly Young vs Savannah Koon6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLacey Harden vs Elizabeth Gatlin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-17vs Clinic Peeps 3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesElise Mcmasters vs Patti Carroll6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSara Gammill vs Sherry Vance6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRebekah Wiseman vs Susie Miley6-0, 6-0
2024-11-11vs Nolan/Davis 3.0 SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesElise Mcmasters vs Lauren Huckaby6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRebekah Wiseman vs Beth Nolan6-1, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Nolan/Davis 3.0 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesHester Lowe vs Sara Davis6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSara Gammill vs April Gray6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTabi Talley vs Ann Hazel7-5, 6-3
2024-10-29vs Clinic Peeps 3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesKelly Young vs Kayla Reynolds6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHester Lowe vs Joy Whittle6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTabi Talley vs Sherry Vance6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kelly Young
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Kate Bell
published
3.14
Hester Lowe
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Elise Mcmasters
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Rebekah Wiseman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Lacey Harden
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.83
Sara Gammill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.50
Tabi Talley
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Bell + Kelly Young15368% games+12.5% vs expected
Hester Lowe + Elise Mcmasters4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Young
68W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Kate Bell
55W–33L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Hester Lowe
51W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Elise Mcmasters
56W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Rebekah Wiseman
37W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Lacey Harden
37W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
Sara Gammill
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
Tabi Talley
13W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.