Teams

GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0B

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Lisa Eastlack
published
3.81
La Phengrasamy
published
3.79
Lisa Paler
published 4
3.76
Lisa Laanisto
published
3.75
Tamara York
published
Alexandra Lawson
published 4
Angela Marks
published 4
3.62
Claudia Vlasak
published 4
3.62
Dorsey O'Neill
published 4
3.51
Patti O'Kelly
published
3.50
Ria Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Yuki Matsuoka
published
3.40
Anne Kavanagh
published 3.5
3.33
Martha Ehrenfeld
published
3.23
Janet Arnesty
published
3.12
Mary Anne Ruyle
published
2.99
Helen Y Chang
published 3.5
Karen Forsthoff
published
Pearl Villena
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Eastlack
38W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
La Phengrasamy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Lisa Paler
30W–30L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Lisa Laanisto
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Tamara York
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alexandra Lawson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Angela Marks
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Dorsey O'Neill
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Patti O'Kelly
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Ria Mendoza
72W–75L career · 10 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Yuki Matsuoka
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Anne Kavanagh
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Martha Ehrenfeld
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
Janet Arnesty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.23
Mary Anne Ruyle
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Helen Y Chang
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Karen Forsthoff
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pearl Villena
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.