← Teams

PW.LEE

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-10vs LOCH.PeltLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Deb Lanier4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEllen Libby vs Kristine Pelt1-6, 1-6
2022-08-02vs TOC.SmythSplit 1–1
W#1 SinglesKearsi Kessler vs Sarah Franks4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEllen Libby vs Mary Jo Dunnington0-6, 3-6
2022-07-12Lost 0–1
L#3 SinglesEllen Libby vs Amy Rogers6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-29vs TOC.IrishWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesKearsi Kessler vs Lusia Li6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesValerie Short vs Caroline Irish6-2, 6-0
2022-06-18vs PW.MartinLost 0–1
L#2 SinglesValerie Short vs Meghan Hammes5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-15Won 1–0
W#3 SinglesHeather Hastings vs Susan Boyd7-5, 6-4
2022-06-01vs TOHS.RiderLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesKearsi Kessler vs Allyson Schneider3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEllen Libby vs Meghan Rider1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Angie Powell
published 4
3.45
Ellen Libby
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Kearsi Kessler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Allison Singer
published 3.5
3.31
Valerie Short
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Heather Hastings
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
—
Leah Lee
published —
—
Leslie McAulay
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kearsi Kessler + Ellen Libby3–550% gamesnot enough data
Kearsi Kessler + Allison Singer2–24 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Short + Ellen Libby2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Powell
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Ellen Libby
140W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Kearsi Kessler
135W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Allison Singer
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Valerie Short
181W–98L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Heather Hastings
61W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
—
Leah Lee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
—
Leslie McAulay
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.