Teams

LOCH.Pelt

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-10vs PW.LEEWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Heather Hastings6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Ellen Libby6-1, 6-1
2022-07-26vs CAS.BoydSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Lorena Warix6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDebra Combos vs Michiyo Pedersen3-6, 3-6
2022-06-29vs TOHS.RiderLost 12
L#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Allyson Schneider6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Meghan Rider6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Emily Starritt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-22vs TOC.SmythLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Laura Rendon2-6, 1-6
2022-06-21vs TOC.IrishLost 01
L#2 SinglesDebra Combos vs Shelly Jude5-7, 6-7
2022-06-15vs PW.MartinWon 20
W#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Jennifer Hensley7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Rebecca Jacobsen6-1, 6-0
2022-06-01vs MD.McKinleyWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Marcy Points7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Beth McKinley6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Paula Fernandez-Pita
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 5
3.56
Deb Lanier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Wendy Hanshew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Pelt
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.94
Sharon Poindexter
published
2.83
Debra Combos
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Hanshew + Kristine Pelt4453% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Paula Fernandez-Pita
148W–60L career · type D · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.66
3.5
Deb Lanier
488W–223L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Wendy Hanshew
111W–146L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Kristine Pelt
155W–108L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
12W–26L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Debra Combos
81W–119L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.