Teams

Motichek/Ortis-18/3.0/M/Pelican

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-12Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Lucas / Daniel Sweetman vs Jared Matherne / Jake Springer6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPacifico Gouge vs Nick Bowers5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLuis Jonathan Perez / Ryan Bailey vs Jordan Nash / Alexander Stallard1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-15Split 11
L#2 SinglesPacifico Gouge vs Eric Lee5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Bailey / Luis Jonathan Perez vs Kirk Michel / Ray Dussold2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-01vs Faucheux 18/3.0/M/Beau CheneLost 02
L#2 DoublesLuis Jonathan Perez / Alexander Mata Iv vs Sean McMullen / Daniel Dodson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTim Barousse / Daniel Sweetman vs Ted Ashby / Brian Goldstein6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-25Split 11
L#2 DoublesLuis Jonathan Perez / Alexander Mata Iv vs Caleb Mcdonald / Philip Qualls3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Sweetman / Ryan Bailey vs Billy Beasley / Matthew Salas6-1, 6-1
2026-03-21Lost 02
L#1 SinglesPacifico Gouge vs Nick Bowers6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDaniel Sweetman vs Dallas Swan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesR Timothy Brown / Daniel Sweetman vs Michael Donohue / Charles Monteiro4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLuis Jonathan Perez vs Eric Lee0-6, 2-6
2026-03-04vs Faucheux 18/3.0/M/Beau CheneLost 01
L#3 DoublesLandon Brown / Luis Jonathan Perez vs Ted Ashby / Rick Wilkins4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesPacifico Gouge / Ethan Hunt vs Mike Morgan / Baldwin Barkerding6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Matherne-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek91391135329
2Parvizian-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek82341644390
3Faucheux 18/3.0/M/Beau Chene55302045418
4Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress46193167467
5Motichek/Ortis-18/3.0/M/Pelican37203064440
6Tusa 3.0/18/M/TCC1964489547

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Ethan Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
JP Love
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Evan Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.44
Alexander Mata Iv
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Daniel Sweetman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jason Ortis
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kurt Kopanke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Landon Brown
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Luis Jonathan Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Pacifico Gouge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
R Timothy Brown
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Shashvat Doorwar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Barousse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JP Love + Travis Motichek123 matchesnot enough data
Travis Motichek + Alexander Mata Iv033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ethan Hunt
16W–4L career · type D · 12 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3
JP Love
16W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Evan Bailey
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Alexander Mata Iv
14W–32L career · type S · 30 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.44
Daniel Sweetman
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Ortis
16W–34L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kurt Kopanke
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Landon Brown
10W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Jonathan Perez
6W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Lucas
17W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pacifico Gouge
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
R Timothy Brown
20W–33L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shashvat Doorwar
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Barousse
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Travis Motichek
17W–29L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.