Teams

Tusa 3.0/18/M/TCC

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Matherne-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek91391135329
2Parvizian-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek82341644390
3Faucheux 18/3.0/M/Beau Chene55302045418
4Schultze-18/3.0/M/N Cypress46193167467
5Motichek/Ortis-18/3.0/M/Pelican37203064440
6Tusa 3.0/18/M/TCC1964489547

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Chris Tusa
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.14
Baldwin Barkerding
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.90
Cameron Woodward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jeffrey Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jordan Heltz
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Justin Clinton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Alario
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Mike Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Nathaniel Parks
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Ross Ledoux
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Alario + Justin Clinton0519% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Nathaniel Parks044 matchesnot enough data
Baldwin Barkerding + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Ross Ledoux033 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Nathaniel Parks033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Mike Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Ross Ledoux + Jordan Heltz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Tusa
8W–37L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
2.5
Baldwin Barkerding
2W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Cameron Woodward
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Jeffrey Hufft
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jordan Heltz
4W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Justin Clinton
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Alario
2W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Morgan
6W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nathaniel Parks
1W–19L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ross Ledoux
5W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.